Re: [Phys-l] Flipping the Classroom vs Traditional Lecture
Sorry I sent this out with the wrong subject header!
Kieran Mathieson wrote on the POD list:
> Mazur's work is not really representative of what flipped normally means. The
> idea behind flipped:
>
> - There are two main components of most classes: (1) students
> listening/watching someone explain something, and (2) students practicing,
> e.g., working through problems.
>
> - Traditional classes have students listening/watching in a face-to-face
> class, and practicing on their own outside of class (homework).
>
> - Flipped courses have students listening/watching/reading on their own
> outside of class, and practicing in a face-to-face class, or other
> synchronous way.
>
> My variant on this is that the independent, outside-of-class work also
> includes many exercises, with formative feedback. See
> http://coredogs.com/article/tale-two-students for a short story. I've been
> running courses this way for a few years.
>
> Recently, I've started working on http://flippedtextbook.com, tools for
> helping other people write textbooks (or chapters, modules, whatever) that
> support this model.
>
> Kieran
In 1995 I wrote:
> When I started cooperative groups in my large introductory course.
> My student evaluation plummeted. It took me years to get it right in a
> student-centered approach.
We called it a student-centred approach then not a flipped classroom.
> I kept working on getting it right because the
> students who used to be turned off in my introductory physics course were
> being turned on. It was the traditional science students who objected and
> they learned just as well in either approach.
>
> I do expect is that my students come to class having read the material...
> they dont
>
> It took me a while to get this one right too. Thanks to suggestions from
> my wife, I adopted a "writing to learn" approach where the students have
> to write on the topics to be covered in class in advance of the class.
This is the keystone of my approach. I have students metacognitively deal with
the material in the textbook before coming to class. See
Enhancing Students' Understanding Of Concepts By Getting Students to
Approach Text in The Manner of a Hermeneutical Circle
Calvin S. Kalman (Published online 5 September 2010).
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-010-9298-z
Science & Education: 20(2), 159–172, 2011.
&
Students Perceptions of Reflective Writing as a Tool for Exploring an
Introductory Textbook.
Calvin S. Kalman, Mark Aulls, Shelley Rohar and John Godley
Journal of College Science Teaching March/April 2008 37(3),74-81
>
> The problem
> As one of my colleagues (a former chair of math!) pointed out this
> morning many of us love to be the centre of attention. It is very hard to
> let go and let the students have their say without rushing in to correct
> them. Facilating discussion after group work is not simply making
> brilliant points for the students to respond to. Then again groups can't
> simply be formed and set to task. Students have to be groomed to work
> together and then encouraged over and over.
>
> The students cannot work in groups.
> Even with grooming some groups will be dysfunctional. So you have
> to get feedback from the groups. Then meet with the problem groups. Gee it
> was so easy to just dust off the old notes and glance at them before class.
>
> I agree.... I don't TEACH!!!!
> Nowadays my students seem to think I do and are happy with the
> student-centred approach. Keep experimenting until you get the right
> approach. Little things seem to matter. In my advanced courses, I start
> group work right away, but in the intro couse, for my classes it seems to
> be inportant to wait two weeks until the course change period is over, the
> class has settled down and the class has adjusted to my style.
I should point out that results are best if you follow up by having students do
writing assignments outside of the classroom:
Enhancing conceptual change using argumentative essays
Calvin S. Kalman, Shelley Rohar and David Wells
Am. J. Phys 72, 715-717, 2004.
Best wishes
Calvin
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
_/ Dr. Calvin S. Kalman P. Phys. Phone: (514) 848-2424 xt 3284
_/ Professor,Department of Physics Fax: (514) 848-2828
_/ Principal, Science College
_/ Concordia University
_/ Montreal, QC H4B 1R6 Calvin.Kalman@concordia.ca
_/
_/ Also Adjunct Professor Department of Educational
_/ and Counseling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
_/
_/
_/ homepage- http://physics.concordia.ca/faculty/ckalman.php
_/
_/ Editor-in-Chief book series Science & Engineering Education Sources
_/ http://www.infoagepub.com/series/Science-Engineering-Education-Sources
_/
_/ See
_/ Successful Science and Engineering Teaching in Colleges and Universities
_/ at
_/ http://www.josseybass.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1933371161.html
_/ See review found in the Journal of Chemical Education Oct. 2007:
_/ http://tinyurl.com/2rt7tj
_/
_/ For the research behind this book see:
_/ "Successful Science and Engineering Teaching: Theoretical and Learning
_/ Perspectives (Innovation and Change in Professional Education)"
_/ at
_/ http://tinyurl.com/3qn237
_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_//_/_/
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l