Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-
bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of John Denker
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:43 PM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] Temperture profile in a graviational field
On 01/17/2012 03:46 PM, Christopher M. Gould wrote:
mass transport equilibrium .... Here, with an imposed gravitational
potential, air at the top of a column will be colder than at the
bottom.
<hypothesis>
Let's explore that idea.
To make it more interesting, set up a copper rod next to the
air column. There will be no mass transport in the copper,
just thermal conductivity, so it will be isothermal.
The rod and the air column have the same temperature at the
bottom, since they are both in contact with the heat bath
at that point.
If they have a different temperature at the top, you can
run a heat engine using the difference. Voilà! Perpetual
motion machine.
</hypothesis>
I'm sticking with thermal equilibrium being isothermal, even for a gas in the
presence of the gravitational field.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l