I appreciate that having the same message posted on several lists can
increase the potential for debate, but it also gets very messy. I
received the posting cited above, that starts:
Some subscribers to Phys-L (or whatever list) might be
interested in a recent post "Can Education Research Be
'Scientific'? What's 'Scientific'? (was 'in Defense of. . . .')
" [Hake (2012)]. The abstract reads:
from at least three lists. This was criticising a post on one of those
lists. The author of that post (Noah Podolefsky) responded to point out
that the post cited above misrepresented what he had said by taking
things out of context (for example suggesting Podolefsky adopted a
position when he in fact reported only that some others adopted that
position). But that response has only appeared (so far) on the original
list. So on at least two other lists the original posting has (so far)
appeared without the person being misrepresented having the chance to
put the record straight.
This all seems very messy to me.
I think there are occasions when cross-posting is appropriate, but I
find the systematic cross-posting that seems to have become habitual
recently, unhelpful.
Perhaps it is sensible to initiate discussions on several lists, but
then it may be more appropriate only to post responses to the replies on
the particular lists where those replies appear.
I also wonder about copyright issues here. There are normal
understandings about what is considered about fair use, but presumably
if I add my own copyright statement (see below) then anyone who chooses
to ignore this statement is infringing my copyright (as well as acting
unethically/unprofessionally).
I would not want to start appending such a statement to all my list
postings, but perhaps we are reaching the stage where we will need to do
this to stop our words being re-quoted in distorted ways on other lists
(whether due to poor scholarship or deliberate mischief-making) without
our knowledge?
Or perhaps I'm the only one who gets uneasy about the way these things
are developing, and everyone else is happy enough with the messy way
some messages get selectively redistributed around different lists?
Best wishes
Keith
*This posting is copyright Keith S Taber (2012): permission is granted
for it to be cited/quoted on the lists to which I have posted it: it may
not be reproduced elsewhere except that (a) it is posted in full with no
omissions or editing; (b) a copy of the full text in which the posting
appears, with details of where posted, are provided to the author at
kst24@cam.ac.uk*
--
Dr. Keith S. Taber
Chair: Science, Technology & Mathematics Education Academic Group
University Reader in Science Education
University of Cambridge Faculty of Education