Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of September, 2011
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
[Phys-l] Bernoulli, Coanda, or Lanchester-Prandtl
,
09/01/2011 03:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bernoulli, Coanda, or Lanchester-Prandtl
,
09/01/2011 04:04, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Bernoulli, Coanda, or Lanchester-Prandtl
,
09/01/2011 07:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bernoulli, Coanda, or Lanchester-Prandtl
,
09/01/2011 07:43, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Bernoulli, Coanda, or Lanchester-Prandtl
,
09/01/2011 08:15, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bernoulli, Coanda, or Lanchester-Prandtl
,
09/01/2011 09:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bernoulli, Coanda, or Lanchester-Prandtl
,
09/01/2011 10:39, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] A good video to teach force and motion?
,
09/01/2011 15:15, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] A good video to teach force and motion?
,
09/01/2011 15:31, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] setting-time-aright
,
09/02/2011 03:51, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Interesting students in clicker questions?
,
09/02/2011 05:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] setting-time-aright
,
09/02/2011 09:08, John Denker
[Phys-l] radiation data in the Fukushima area
,
09/02/2011 09:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] radiation data in the Fukushima area
,
09/02/2011 10:19, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Does the Holographic Principle Need a Quantum Theory of Gravity?
,
09/03/2011 05:00, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/05/2011 11:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/05/2011 15:05, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/05/2011 19:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 03:24, Bailey, Steven
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 04:49, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 05:14, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 06:13, arnulfo castellanos
[Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 08:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 08:43, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 09:05, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 09:53, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 10:09, John Denker
[Phys-l] [off list] thanks re: coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 10:35, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 10:37, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] [off list] thanks re: coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 10:39, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 11:15, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 11:21, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Lack of rigor: low increase in crit. thinking
,
09/06/2011 11:47, Price Daniel S .
[Phys-l] piloting +- critical thinking
,
09/06/2011 12:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 12:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 13:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations - Disdainful Responses?
,
09/06/2011 17:44, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations
,
09/06/2011 17:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] singing rods
,
09/06/2011 18:27, John Denker
[Phys-l] feedback
,
09/07/2011 07:23, Kyle Forinash
[Phys-l] Acoustic trivia
,
09/07/2011 09:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] singing rods
,
09/07/2011 10:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Bad physics? coupled oscillations - Disdainful Responses?
,
09/07/2011 10:45, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] A trivium
,
09/07/2011 11:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Musical Instrument Project [1 Attachment]
,
09/07/2011 11:06, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] An unacceptable teacher:
,
09/07/2011 14:41, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
09/08/2011 11:58, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] Home made energy scam
,
09/08/2011 12:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Home made energy scam
,
09/08/2011 13:25, chuck britton
[Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/08/2011 17:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 02:58, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 04:02, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 04:13, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
09/09/2011 04:33, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
09/09/2011 04:36, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 06:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 06:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] scenarios +- predictions
,
09/09/2011 06:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] scenarios +- predictions
,
09/09/2011 08:41, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 09:26, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 10:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 10:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
09/09/2011 11:10, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
09/09/2011 12:02, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Home made energy scam---don't go to the link...waste of your time
,
09/09/2011 12:10, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
09/09/2011 12:16, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 12:20, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 12:26, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 12:37, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 13:01, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/09/2011 13:06, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Home made energy scam---don't go to the link...waste of your time
,
09/09/2011 13:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 13:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] an all-too-predictable blackout
,
09/09/2011 14:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/09/2011 14:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Tacoma Narrows
,
09/09/2011 14:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Home made energy scam---don't go to the link...waste of your time
,
09/09/2011 14:25, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Is safer than you thought. Was: Re: Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/09/2011 14:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Home made energy scam---don't go to the link...waste of your time
,
09/09/2011 14:29, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/09/2011 14:29, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 00:51, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 01:08, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 04:33, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 07:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 10:36, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 10:47, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 13:02, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor.
,
09/10/2011 13:06, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 13:34, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 13:41, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 14:13, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 14:33, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 14:53, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 15:07, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 16:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 16:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor.
,
09/10/2011 17:12, fletcher
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/10/2011 17:46, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 05:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 06:12, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Restarting nuclear power plants
,
09/11/2011 08:00, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Restarting nuclear power plants
,
09/11/2011 08:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 11:34, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 11:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 11:59, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 12:30, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/11/2011 13:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 16:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Power and the Grid
,
09/11/2011 17:36, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 04:28, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/12/2011 04:46, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 04:47, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/12/2011 06:56, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/12/2011 06:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/12/2011 07:23, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/12/2011 07:34, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 08:50, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 08:59, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] management with or without merit
,
09/12/2011 09:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 09:07, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 09:11, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 09:23, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 10:02, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 10:28, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 10:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 11:17, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 11:34, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 14:57, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 16:38, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/12/2011 17:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Movie Physics Gafs
,
09/12/2011 20:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/12/2011 21:04, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 06:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 06:26, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 06:31, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-l] Physics Education Position at Illinois State University
,
09/13/2011 07:22, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 07:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 07:27, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] considering *all* the plausible hypotheses
,
09/13/2011 07:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 10:46, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 10:51, Price Daniel S .
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 11:05, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 16:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 16:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/13/2011 16:58, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] S Duality and Time Reversal Invariance
,
09/14/2011 03:53, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] S Duality and Time Reversal Invariance typo corr
,
09/14/2011 04:03, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/14/2011 08:58, Bill Baggett
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/14/2011 09:34, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/14/2011 10:08, Bill Baggett
Re: [Phys-l] lab safety rules +- time on task +- symbolism
,
09/14/2011 12:09, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/14/2011 13:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/14/2011 15:46, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/15/2011 00:23, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/15/2011 03:41, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/15/2011 04:58, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] PER goes mainstream (public radio) Fwd: [PTSOS] Talk on Radioworks re Peer Instruction/Mazur
,
09/15/2011 07:18, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] fused quartz does not conduct?
,
09/15/2011 09:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] fused quartz does not conduct?
,
09/15/2011 09:24, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] fused quartz does not conduct?
,
09/15/2011 10:30, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] fused quartz does not conduct?
,
09/15/2011 16:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/16/2011 08:49, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Software for drawing free-body diagrams?
,
09/16/2011 09:33, curtis osterhoudt
[Phys-l] Automatic translations
,
09/18/2011 05:16, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Workshop @ CU Boulder November 2 & 3
,
09/19/2011 07:33, Jacob Clark Blickenstaff
[Phys-l] Learning Assistant Workshop, Take 2
,
09/19/2011 07:56, Jacob Clark Blickenstaff
[Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/19/2011 10:39, Zeke Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/19/2011 12:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/19/2011 12:39, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/19/2011 12:43, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/19/2011 14:19, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/19/2011 16:17, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/19/2011 19:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/20/2011 01:54, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] phase and mplitude in E&M
,
09/20/2011 06:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/20/2011 12:49, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/20/2011 14:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/20/2011 15:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Amplitude in E&M
,
09/20/2011 15:56, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 00:31, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 03:39, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 04:36, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Classic Physics Problem in the Straight Dope
,
09/23/2011 06:35, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 07:01, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 07:03, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 07:13, Cindy Schwarz
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 07:16, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 07:24, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 07:33, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 07:50, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] Fwd: Math/Science Teacher
,
09/23/2011 07:53, Shahram Mostarshed
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/23/2011 11:19, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] The Impact of Concept Inventories On Physics Education and It's Relevance For Engineering Education
,
09/23/2011 17:05, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 05:30, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 06:19, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 06:26, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 06:30, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 07:06, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 07:13, alex brown
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 09:55, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 11:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 13:07, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 13:16, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/24/2011 16:44, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/25/2011 05:30, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] The Impact of Concept Inventories On Physics Education and It's Relevance For Engineering Education (Richard Hake)
,
09/25/2011 15:59, James Cibulka
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/25/2011 17:15, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/26/2011 06:14, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/26/2011 07:07, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/26/2011 12:30, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/26/2011 12:49, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/26/2011 12:51, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] The Impact of Concept Inventories On Physics Education and It's Relevance For Engineering Education (Richard Hake)
,
09/26/2011 15:32, Bill
[Phys-l] Physics joke. Was: Fwd: [tap-l] A neighbor needs help
,
09/26/2011 18:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Physics joke. Was: Fwd: [tap-l] A neighbor needs help
,
09/26/2011 18:56, John Clement
[Phys-l] Faster-than-light neutrino claim bolstered
,
09/27/2011 02:54, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Faster-than-light neutrino claim bolstered
,
09/27/2011 07:11, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] nails
,
09/27/2011 07:26, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] nails
,
09/27/2011 07:40, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] nails
,
09/27/2011 09:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] nails
,
09/27/2011 09:28, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] On the muon neutrino mass
,
09/27/2011 11:06, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] nails
,
09/27/2011 16:06, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/27/2011 18:38, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/28/2011 00:40, Herbert Schulz
[Phys-l] Constrains on the Electron -Neutrino Mass From the Super Nova Data (SN1987A)
,
09/28/2011 04:37, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/28/2011 06:05, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Neutrinos going faster than speed of light?
,
09/28/2011 06:11, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] Budget 3D Printing.
,
09/28/2011 07:37, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 09:43, andre adler
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 10:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 10:54, Jacob Clark Blickenstaff
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 11:23, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 11:38, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 11:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 13:17, Dr Holly Priestley
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 15:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/28/2011 16:49, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 00:37, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 02:28, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 04:48, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 05:13, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 05:22, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 05:31, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 05:39, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 05:53, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 06:02, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 06:51, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 07:36, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 07:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 08:34, John Clement
[Phys-l] PhysTEC solicitation for new sites- now available
,
09/29/2011 09:36, Jacob Clark Blickenstaff
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 10:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 10:37, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 11:15, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 11:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 12:39, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 12:41, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 12:43, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 12:52, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 13:01, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 15:55, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] distance, rate, time
,
09/29/2011 16:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] distance, rate, time
,
09/29/2011 16:41, Price Daniel S .
Re: [Phys-l] distance, rate, time
,
09/29/2011 17:17, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 17:27, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/29/2011 19:24, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Fwd: [rete] Video clips with classical physics demonstrations
,
09/30/2011 02:04, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] distance, rate, time
,
09/30/2011 04:12, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/30/2011 05:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/30/2011 06:01, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/30/2011 06:17, Philip Keller
[Phys-l] Over Fifty Suggestions of Books For a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Book Club
,
09/30/2011 06:59, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Circadian and weekly cycles in Topic Interest - World wide
,
09/30/2011 07:26, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/30/2011 07:36, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Student Misconceptions
,
09/30/2011 07:56, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Circadian and weekly cycles in Topic Interest - World wide
,
09/30/2011 08:04, Robert Cohen
[Phys-l] uncertainty +- error (was: misconceptions)
,
09/30/2011 09:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] uncertainty +- error (was: misconceptions)
,
09/30/2011 12:50, Dan Beeker
Re: [Phys-l] uncertainty +- error
,
09/30/2011 13:44, John Denker
[Phys-l] Non-Student Misconceptions
,
09/30/2011 19:29, John Denker
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc