Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2



Selection - yes, that's an important part of determining who will climb to the top of the Ivory Tower.
But what about the seething masses left below??
SOME of whom really do want to learn.

I think of my grandfather who had an eighth grade education (as was common back then) but worked with MIT's RADAR Labs to develop weather related applications.
And my father-in-law with similar education who was a published poet as well as truck driver and unionizer.
.
At 9:18 AM -0700 7/21/11, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
On 2011, Jul 20, , at 18:52, CalvinKalman wrote:

You can't argue on the basis of outliers such as Bill Gates. There were undoubtedly a few of Feynman's students at Caltech who were tremendously inspired by the lectures.
Best wishes
Calvin


Perhaps the lecture system is a good method of selection like the method used at Annapolis. The students that pass the test carry it on. So we, Gates, et alii think it works. It does.

bc thinks this has been alluded on this list.


_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l