Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of July, 2011
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] the uniqueness of entropy
,
07/01/2011 09:39, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] the uniqueness of entropy
,
07/02/2011 16:40, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] the uniqueness of entropy
,
07/02/2011 16:50, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] the uniqueness of entropy
,
07/02/2011 17:17, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] the uniqueness of entropy
,
07/02/2011 17:27, carmelo
[Phys-l] Modeling Workshop openings in July & August: HS chemistry & physics teachers
,
07/02/2011 20:23, Jane Jackson
Re: [Phys-l] the uniqueness of entropy
,
07/03/2011 04:50, Moses Fayngold
[Phys-l] modern programming
,
07/04/2011 19:19, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] modern programming
,
07/05/2011 01:37, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] modern programming
,
07/05/2011 16:22, John Denker
[Phys-l] What do you think of this? Was: Fwd: [PTSOS] Physics Project
,
07/05/2011 18:09, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 05:58, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:05, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:23, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:26, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:31, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:37, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:43, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 06:48, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 07:08, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 09:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 10:13, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 10:32, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 10:38, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/06/2011 16:50, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] Operational Definitions
,
07/06/2011 17:12, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] illustrations of Liouville's theorem
,
07/07/2011 13:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/07/2011 14:36, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/07/2011 17:41, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/07/2011 19:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Step down transformer trouble
,
07/08/2011 16:31, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] atomic trap question
,
07/10/2011 05:03, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] atomic trap question
,
07/10/2011 09:13, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] atomic trap question
,
07/10/2011 09:34, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] atomic trap question
,
07/10/2011 11:24, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] higher-order symplectic integrator
,
07/10/2011 12:09, John Denker
[Phys-l] Off Topic: Gerald Grow's Remarkable Photoillustrations
,
07/10/2011 16:07, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] controlled experiments
,
07/11/2011 14:02, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] zero emission car
,
07/12/2011 16:07, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] zero emission car
,
07/12/2011 16:56, Bill
Re: [Phys-l] zero emission car
,
07/12/2011 18:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] zero emission car
,
07/13/2011 01:49, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] zero emission car
,
07/14/2011 03:21, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] not-anywhere-near-zero emission car
,
07/14/2011 09:17, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] not-anywhere-near-zero emission car
,
07/14/2011 13:05, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/14/2011 22:48, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 01:05, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 02:01, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 02:40, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 03:43, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 03:58, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 04:05, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 04:39, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 05:08, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 05:10, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 05:56, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 06:12, Bennett
Re: [Phys-l] rolling shutter
,
07/15/2011 06:16, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 06:19, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 06:57, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 07:07, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 07:12, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 07:14, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 07:31, chuck britton
[Phys-l] 3D printing
,
07/15/2011 12:13, Jim Deane
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/15/2011 12:59, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
[Phys-l] distinguishability
,
07/15/2011 16:43, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] distinguishability
,
07/15/2011 18:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] distinguishability
,
07/16/2011 09:14, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] 3-d printer
,
07/17/2011 02:21, Mark Sylvester
[Phys-l] Surprising Searches
,
07/17/2011 03:40, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Surprising Searches
,
07/17/2011 05:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/17/2011 07:59, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] COLD FUSION (now called Condensed Matter Nuclear Science--CMNS)
,
07/18/2011 06:47, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] distinguishability
,
07/18/2011 06:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] COLD FUSION (now called Condensed Matter Nuclear Science--CMNS)
,
07/18/2011 15:00, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 06:24, Paul Corbitt
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:18, Peter Schoch
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:28, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:31, DMathies
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:33, marx
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:43, Peter Schoch
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:51, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:51, Peter Schoch
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 09:58, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 10:07, William Katzman
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories -- or not
,
07/19/2011 12:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] PDF Based Laboratories
,
07/19/2011 13:01, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/19/2011 15:57, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/19/2011 19:05, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/19/2011 19:19, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Scientific illiteracy can kill the planet
,
07/20/2011 08:01, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 10:15, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/20/2011 10:20, Calvin Kalman
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 10:39, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 11:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/20/2011 12:00, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 12:08, Quist, Oren
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 12:10, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 12:22, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 12:31, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 12:37, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 12:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 13:09, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 13:16, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 13:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 13:37, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 14:19, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 14:26, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 14:48, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 14:54, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/20/2011 15:06, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/20/2011 16:20, CalvinKalman
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/20/2011 17:28, Dan L. MacIsaac
[Phys-l] old copies of THe Physics Teacher
,
07/20/2011 19:31, frank cange
Re: [Phys-l] old copies of THe Physics Teacher
,
07/20/2011 19:49, Kelvin Ng
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/20/2011 22:08, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/20/2011 22:58, Joseph Bellina
[Phys-l] At 71, Physics Professor Is a Web Star
,
07/21/2011 00:01, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/21/2011 01:29, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/21/2011 01:47, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] StackExchange
,
07/21/2011 02:46, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 03:49, Dan L. MacIsaac
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 06:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 07:09, chuck britton
[Phys-l] neat video of synchronizing metronomes
,
07/21/2011 07:16, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 07:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 08:07, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] neat video of synchronizing metronomes
,
07/21/2011 10:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] neat video of synchronizing metronomes
,
07/21/2011 11:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 12:33, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] old copies of THe Physics Teacher
,
07/21/2011 12:43, frank cange
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
07/21/2011 14:19, peyman fahimi
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 15:13, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/21/2011 15:22, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
07/21/2011 17:04, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 01:59, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 02:55, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 03:27, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 09:07, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Retention: tail wags dog
,
07/22/2011 09:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 10:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] neat video of synchronizing metronomes
,
07/22/2011 10:31, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] neat video of synchronizing metronomes
,
07/22/2011 11:02, alex brown
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 11:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 11:59, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/22/2011 13:23, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] The Value of Lab Reports (was Lecture Isn't Effective...)
,
07/23/2011 07:00, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] The world's biggest problem? Too many people
,
07/23/2011 08:26, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/23/2011 11:52, pschoch
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/23/2011 13:17, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/23/2011 14:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/23/2011 16:18, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] The Value of Lab Reports (was Lecture Isn't Effective...)
,
07/23/2011 17:02, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/23/2011 17:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/24/2011 10:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/24/2011 10:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/24/2011 10:44, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/24/2011 14:17, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/24/2011 14:43, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Wiki. is wrong
,
07/24/2011 14:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/24/2011 15:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Placebo Education
,
07/24/2011 16:10, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] The world's biggest problem? Too many people
,
07/24/2011 16:48, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Wiki. is wrong
,
07/25/2011 01:34, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Wiki. is wrong
,
07/25/2011 06:05, William Beaty
[Phys-l] phasor power and other nonlinearities -- or not
,
07/25/2011 06:29, John Denker
[Phys-l] Fwd: Proposed Easing of Human Subjects Regulations
,
07/25/2011 09:11, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 10:33, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 10:40, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 10:49, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 10:49, William Katzman
Re: [Phys-l] Lecture Isn't Effective: More Evidence #2
,
07/25/2011 10:52, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 10:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 11:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 11:16, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Ashamed it is physicists and not learning scientists!
,
07/25/2011 14:47, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 17:48, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 18:12, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/25/2011 20:03, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/25/2011 20:44, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/25/2011 20:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 02:31, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 07:11, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 07:26, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 07:38, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 07:50, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 08:35, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 09:56, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 10:05, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 10:17, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] it's a dry heat
,
07/26/2011 10:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 10:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 11:05, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] The Value of Lab Reports (was Lecture Isn't Effective...)
,
07/26/2011 11:23, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 11:42, Paul Nord
Re: [Phys-l] it's a dry heat
,
07/26/2011 13:08, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 13:48, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Ashamed it is physicists and not learning scientists!
,
07/26/2011 14:49, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/26/2011 15:06, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] it's a dry heat
,
07/26/2011 15:24, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 15:47, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] it's a dry heat
,
07/26/2011 15:54, Daryl L Taylor
[Phys-l] facts about temperature records in July 2011
,
07/26/2011 16:15, Price Daniel S .
Re: [Phys-l] Gotta love these HeadLine Writers!
,
07/26/2011 16:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] facts about temperature records in July 2011
,
07/26/2011 17:23, David Marx
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/26/2011 17:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/26/2011 18:21, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/26/2011 19:42, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Computer/web-based administration of the FCI
,
07/27/2011 06:01, Bill Baggett
Re: [Phys-l] facts about temperature records in July 2011
,
07/27/2011 06:09, Price Daniel S .
[Phys-l] Completion Rates for In-Class, Hybrid, and Online Physics Courses
,
07/27/2011 06:49, Ann Reagan
Re: [Phys-l] Wiki. is wrong?
,
07/27/2011 06:59, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] it's a dry heat
,
07/27/2011 07:00, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Wiki. is wrong?
,
07/27/2011 11:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Wiki. is wrong?
,
07/27/2011 12:10, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Wiki. is wrong?
,
07/27/2011 13:09, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] What's a Definitive Academic Reference?
,
07/27/2011 17:09, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] power, energy flow, vectors, tensors, et cetera.
,
07/27/2011 23:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] power, energy flow, vectors, tensors, et cetera.
,
07/28/2011 02:02, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] power, energy flow, vectors, tensors, et cetera.
,
07/28/2011 06:25, John Denker
[Phys-l] (no subject)
,
07/28/2011 10:09, peyman fahimi
[Phys-l] Occasional whimsey (Horsetails)
,
07/28/2011 15:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/28/2011 19:49, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] phasor sign convention
,
07/28/2011 21:15, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/28/2011 23:12, alex brown
Re: [Phys-l] Research on Active Learning in Higher Education
,
07/29/2011 05:08, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Research on Active Learning in Higher Education
,
07/29/2011 21:17, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-l] For our horological friends
,
07/30/2011 07:13, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/30/2011 07:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Why soldiers break step on small bridges, and not so small.
,
07/30/2011 07:33, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Physics Demonstrations: *Both* Education and Entertainment
,
07/31/2011 14:17, Richard Hake
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc