Re: [Phys-l] Electronic Textbooks & MasteringPhysics

["Anthony Lapinski" <Anthony_Lapinski@pds.org>]

I, too, am considering an online textbook/tutorial instead of a paper one.
Better for the environment, less to carry, and cheaper. I really want it
only as a reference as I give my own class notes and math problems to the
students. So a book would only be needed for students who need to review
or want more to understand what I cover in class.

I teach in the high school, both regular and honors physics. So I am
looking for two levels of supplemental materials online. Currently I use
Hewitt (regular) and Cutnell/Johnson (honors).


Forum for Physics Educators <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu> writes:
> I have the possibility to switch to electronic textbooks and more online
> assignments (Specifically the "Mastering" package from Pearson).  I was
> wondering what experience others have had with these.
>
> I teach at a community college with a small enrollment in physics
> (typically 6-12 in both calc-based and non-calc-based).   The "Mastering"
> package seems like a valuable system, especially for reading quizzes and
> practice problems.  
>
> The electronic text I am less sure about.  The electronic text is
> considerably cheaper, but they only have access for 2 years, I believe. 
> Perhaps I am too old-school and prefer holding a book in my hands.  Do
> students learn better or worse from an electronic version?  Obviously
> they can only work where they have access to a computer, which could
> occasionally be a problem.  We do have 8 computers around the classroom,
> so they could at least share copies during class if we need (or I can
> project it onto a screen).
>
>
>
> Anyway, what have you all learned when using such systems?  any words of
> wisdom if  I try this? 
>
> Tim Folkerts
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l