Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] 240 and 600 Hz


On 2011, Apr 18, , at 10:05, John Clement wrote:

Actually the double frame
rate would have been a change in the gearing of the existing projectors,
which was very possible to do without huge expense. And it would probably
have been cheaper than the 70mm films which ate up huge amounts of expensive
film stock.

John M. Clement
Houston, TX


Same film cost, and less projector cost, no?

Would the perception be the same? 70mm: 4X "pixels" (note the ""); double speed sgrt. "noise reduction"?

So 70 mm better?

bc