Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----[Bill Nettles] I disagree with the first half. You could generate neutrons from a spallation process or other reaction [ Be-9 (alpha,n) C-12 or Li-7 (p,n) Be-7] and bombard a U-238 target to make Pu-239, so you don't have to have fission to make it. Also, you can have fission without having U-238 around and avoid making the Pu-239. Yes, while it is NOT a fission product, it is a by-product of having a fission chain reaction in the presence of U-238. You can make it without fission (very slowly).
From:phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-
bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of Bernard Cleyet
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 3:50 PM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] radioactivity in the news -- actual measurements
On 2011, Mar 28, , at 13:20, chuck britton wrote:
I just 'learned' on NPR this afternoon the Plutonium is a fissionWithout the fissioning of U, Pu would not result, therefore it is a
product - from the splitting of Uranium in the reactor. (ouch!!!)
product of the fissioning -- even tho it's the result of neutron
absorption.
bc is not going to cheque the dictionary definition to find he's wrong._______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l