Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of January, 2011
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
[Phys-l] jerk formulas
,
12/30/2010 04:32, Souder Dwight
Re: [Phys-l] jerk formulas
,
01/01/2011 09:48, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] jerk formulas
,
01/01/2011 10:01, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] [BULK] Re: "The Truth Wears Off" by Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker Dec 13, 2010.
,
01/01/2011 11:03, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] [BULK] Re: "The Truth Wears Off" by Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker Dec 13, 2010.
,
01/02/2011 00:17, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Re: "The Truth Wears Off" by Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker Dec 13, 2010.
,
01/02/2011 00:28, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/02/2011 00:38, Scott Hill
[Phys-l] "Hardiness zones" as global warming canary?
,
01/02/2011 01:03, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 01:07, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/02/2011 02:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 12:17, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 13:12, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 13:56, Pete Lohstreter
[Phys-l] Fwd: "Hardiness zones" as global warming canary?
,
01/02/2011 14:11, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] How to Build a Fusion Reactor - Instructable
,
01/02/2011 14:32, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 14:42, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 15:27, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [BULK] Re: "The Truth Wears Off" by Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker Dec 13, 2010.
,
01/02/2011 15:47, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 15:48, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 16:19, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 16:44, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 17:53, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/02/2011 18:10, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] "The Truth Wears Off" by Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker Dec 13, 2010.
,
01/02/2011 18:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 18:43, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 18:51, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/02/2011 19:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 19:19, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/02/2011 19:38, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 19:47, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Is the Poisson distribution appropriate to describe the bunched arrival of shoppers at the pay point?
,
01/02/2011 20:06, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/02/2011 20:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [BULK] Re: "The Truth Wears Off" by Jonah Lehrer in The New Yorker Dec 13, 2010.
,
01/02/2011 22:36, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] FW: "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/03/2011 02:32, John Clement
[Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 10:48, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 11:24, alex brown
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 12:07, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 13:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 16:36, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 16:37, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 16:37, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/03/2011 19:37, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 01:16, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/04/2011 02:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] techshop opportunity
,
01/04/2011 02:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/04/2011 09:12, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/04/2011 10:04, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/04/2011 11:08, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 11:56, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 12:12, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/04/2011 12:26, Moses Fayngold
[Phys-l] A trivial question (was: Types of scalars)
,
01/04/2011 13:12, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] A trivial question
,
01/04/2011 13:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] A trivial question (was: Types of scalars)
,
01/04/2011 13:26, Tom Sandin
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 13:34, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 13:56, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] IGTPAOATPDNCWIPI
,
01/04/2011 14:01, John Denker
[Phys-l] Another t trivial question
,
01/04/2011 14:10, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Another t trivial question
,
01/04/2011 14:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Another t trivial question
,
01/04/2011 14:34, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Another t trivial question
,
01/04/2011 14:46, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 16:14, John Clement
[Phys-l] Buoyancy again
,
01/04/2011 18:47, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Buoyancy again
,
01/04/2011 18:54, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/04/2011 18:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Buoyancy again
,
01/04/2011 19:10, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Buoyancy again
,
01/04/2011 19:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Another t trivial question
,
01/04/2011 19:20, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 19:50, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Types of scalars
,
01/04/2011 20:15, Moses Fayngold
Re: [Phys-l] A trivial question (was: Types of scalars)
,
01/04/2011 22:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/04/2011 23:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/05/2011 00:09, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/05/2011 00:56, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/05/2011 02:28, marx
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/05/2011 05:49, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/05/2011 06:25, Philip Keller
[Phys-l] Monty Hall problem (was: Marilyn)
,
01/05/2011 07:17, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/05/2011 09:04, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem (was: Marilyn)
,
01/05/2011 10:23, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 11:28, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/05/2011 13:16, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 13:40, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 14:11, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 14:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 14:29, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 14:51, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 14:56, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 15:11, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 15:26, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 15:27, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 15:35, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 15:56, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 16:03, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 16:21, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 16:38, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 17:00, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 17:18, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 17:34, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 18:34, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 19:18, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Learning Outcomes: Face-to-Face vs Online #3
,
01/05/2011 19:20, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 19:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 19:50, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 19:55, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 20:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 20:59, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 22:18, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 22:40, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 22:51, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 23:04, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/05/2011 23:33, John Denker
[Phys-l] Mpemba effect Was: Re: "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/06/2011 01:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 07:39, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 09:11, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Mpemba effect Was: Re: "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/06/2011 09:45, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] "Ask Marilyn"
,
01/06/2011 09:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 09:54, chemtchur@aol.com
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 09:56, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 10:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 10:15, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 10:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 10:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 10:37, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] The joy of stats.
,
01/06/2011 10:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] The joy of stats.
,
01/06/2011 11:07, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 12:28, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem
,
01/06/2011 13:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 14:00, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 14:05, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 14:13, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 14:18, Price Daniel S .
[Phys-l] Average potential at the center of a square matrix with some conditions
,
01/06/2011 15:47, peyman fahimi
[Phys-l] How many solar flare events each year?
,
01/06/2011 16:37, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 17:06, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 18:41, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] How many solar flare events each year?
,
01/06/2011 19:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Monty Hall problem quantum effect
,
01/06/2011 19:55, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] How many solar flare events each year?
,
01/06/2011 20:11, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] How many solar flare events each year?
,
01/06/2011 20:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] How many solar flare events each year?
,
01/07/2011 11:10, William Maddox
[Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/08/2011 20:35, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/08/2011 22:09, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/08/2011 22:59, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/08/2011 23:29, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/08/2011 23:29, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 00:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 00:53, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 07:18, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 09:47, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 10:12, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 11:51, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 11:53, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 13:44, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 14:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 15:11, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 16:09, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 18:13, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/09/2011 20:50, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 03:26, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Naomi Oreskes - Merchants of Doubt
,
01/10/2011 03:26, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 12:27, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 13:06, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 13:15, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 14:14, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 14:28, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 14:31, John Clement
[Phys-l] Removal from list
,
01/10/2011 15:33, Espinosa, James
Re: [Phys-l] Removal from list
,
01/10/2011 15:39, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 15:50, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 16:47, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 16:49, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 16:50, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 17:06, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 17:12, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 17:27, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 18:10, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 19:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 20:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 20:27, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 21:12, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Naomi Oreskes - Merchants of Doubt
,
01/10/2011 21:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/10/2011 22:16, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Learning Outcomes: Face-to-Face vs Online #7
,
01/10/2011 22:47, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/11/2011 01:56, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Antimatter from Thunderstorms
,
01/11/2011 07:11, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Antimatter from Thunderstorms
,
01/11/2011 08:04, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 13:04, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/11/2011 13:22, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 13:44, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 13:58, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 14:29, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 14:38, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 14:47, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Why question(s), again?
,
01/11/2011 15:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and causation
,
01/11/2011 15:16, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Why question(s), again?
,
01/11/2011 15:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and causation
,
01/11/2011 15:44, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and causation
,
01/11/2011 15:49, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and causation
,
01/11/2011 16:00, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Why question(s), again?
,
01/11/2011 16:00, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Why question(s), again?
,
01/11/2011 16:02, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Why question(s), again?
,
01/11/2011 16:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 17:37, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe Is Not Designed for Us [Hardcover]
,
01/11/2011 18:10, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/11/2011 18:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and causation
,
01/11/2011 18:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Why does light travel at the speed of light?
,
01/11/2011 19:08, Robert Yeend
Re: [Phys-l] Why question(s), again?
,
01/11/2011 19:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Why question(s), again?
,
01/11/2011 20:19, carmelo
[Phys-l] dead time correction error
,
01/11/2011 20:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 00:19, John Clement
[Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 12:49, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 13:08, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 13:27, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 13:41, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 13:53, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 14:07, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 14:21, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 14:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 14:29, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 15:00, William Robertson
[Phys-l] check your units conversion
,
01/12/2011 16:41, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-l] [phys-l] electric field due to uniform ring of charge, off-axis
,
01/12/2011 16:52, Krishna Chowdary
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 17:09, marx
[Phys-l] looking for set of filters for activity experiment
,
01/12/2011 17:33, marx
[Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 17:38, Jeff Loats
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 17:42, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 17:48, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 17:55, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 18:03, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 18:31, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 18:52, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 19:12, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] [phys-l] electric field due to uniform ring of charge, off-axis
,
01/12/2011 19:25, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 19:36, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 19:41, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] [phys-l] electric field due to uniform ring of charge, off-axis
,
01/12/2011 20:00, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] [phys-l] electric field due to uniform ring of charge, off-axis
,
01/12/2011 20:05, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] [phys-l] electric field due to uniform ring of charge, off-axis
,
01/12/2011 20:34, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] [phys-l] electric field due to uniform ring of charge, off-axis
,
01/12/2011 20:36, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 21:33, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 21:52, Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] The Ceiling Effect #2
,
01/12/2011 22:00, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Newton and Snell (was Global evolution as fact)
,
01/12/2011 22:07, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/12/2011 22:16, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/12/2011 22:22, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/12/2011 22:26, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 22:34, Jeff Loats
Re: [Phys-l] looking for set of filters for activity experiment
,
01/12/2011 23:34, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/12/2011 23:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/12/2011 23:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/12/2011 23:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Sloan Digital Sky Survey-III (SDSS-III) collaboration
,
01/12/2011 23:48, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/12/2011 23:49, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/12/2011 23:51, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] looking for set of filters for activity experiment
,
01/12/2011 23:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/13/2011 01:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/13/2011 01:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/13/2011 02:48, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/13/2011 03:59, Dr. Keith S. Taber
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/13/2011 09:22, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] The Largest Black Holes in the Universe
,
01/13/2011 09:24, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Biggest Black Hole Ever Found in Nearby Galaxy
,
01/13/2011 09:24, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/13/2011 12:21, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] weird "?"
,
01/13/2011 13:37, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] looking for set of filters for activity experiment
,
01/13/2011 14:28, William Maddox
[Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/13/2011 17:52, Andrew Duffy
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/13/2011 18:07, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/13/2011 18:12, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/13/2011 19:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/13/2011 20:09, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-l] Information as reality
,
01/13/2011 20:32, D.V.N. Sarma
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/13/2011 23:15, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/13/2011 23:17, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/14/2011 04:51, John Denker
[Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 07:50, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 09:00, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 09:08, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 09:22, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 09:50, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 10:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 10:36, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 10:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 10:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 11:16, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 11:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 11:41, marx
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 12:07, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 12:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 12:45, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 12:51, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/14/2011 13:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/14/2011 14:00, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/14/2011 14:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 15:12, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 15:40, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 17:00, Price Daniel S .
Re: [Phys-l] Will the US ever switch to the metric system?
,
01/14/2011 17:20, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 18:11, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Convergence of the Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, and Engineering
,
01/14/2011 18:33, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/14/2011 18:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 18:47, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 20:43, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 22:01, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 22:05, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 23:44, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 23:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 23:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/14/2011 23:54, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] OFF LIST SUBJECT UN rant
,
01/14/2011 23:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/15/2011 00:02, chuck britton
[Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/15/2011 09:06, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/15/2011 11:16, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-l] Orbital Motion of Electrons
,
01/15/2011 11:18, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/15/2011 11:56, David Willey
Re: [Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/15/2011 12:01, David Willey
[Phys-l] diophantine equations
,
01/15/2011 12:11, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] diophantine equations
,
01/15/2011 12:22, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] diophantine equations
,
01/15/2011 15:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/16/2011 18:58, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/16/2011 23:09, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Holocaust denier? Was: Re: Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 02:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 07:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 12:25, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 14:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 15:10, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 15:34, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 15:39, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 15:58, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 16:14, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 19:57, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 20:57, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 21:18, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 21:21, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 21:46, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 22:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 23:05, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 23:11, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 23:16, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 23:17, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/17/2011 23:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/17/2011 23:43, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] word games
,
01/17/2011 23:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Evolution as fact
,
01/18/2011 00:07, M. Horton
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/18/2011 07:18, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/18/2011 08:56, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] word games
,
01/18/2011 09:12, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] Acronyms
,
01/18/2011 09:22, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Holocaust denier? Was: Re: Global Evolution as fact
,
01/18/2011 09:48, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Director of Academic Support search
,
01/18/2011 10:01, Zollman, Dean
Re: [Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/18/2011 10:50, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/18/2011 12:07, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/18/2011 12:11, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 13:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 14:21, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 15:45, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Domestic light sources
,
01/18/2011 16:10, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 16:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 16:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/18/2011 16:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 16:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 16:28, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/18/2011 16:48, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/18/2011 16:50, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Electron vs. Alpha particle...
,
01/18/2011 17:07, Jeff Loats
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/18/2011 17:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 17:25, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 17:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 17:57, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] spectra from flame tests
,
01/18/2011 18:22, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] spectra from flame tests
,
01/18/2011 18:38, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] spectra from flame tests
,
01/18/2011 18:40, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] spectra from flame tests
,
01/18/2011 18:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] spectra from flame tests
,
01/18/2011 19:34, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 20:32, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/18/2011 22:26, Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] Value-Added Inequities: Should Value-Added Measures Be Used to Evaluate Teachers?
,
01/18/2011 22:40, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] The humble physicist
,
01/19/2011 01:42, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Earth's magnetic field
,
01/19/2011 02:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] spectra from flame tests
,
01/19/2011 03:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/19/2011 03:00, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] modern light sources
,
01/19/2011 03:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/19/2011 07:56, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/19/2011 12:30, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/19/2011 14:01, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/19/2011 18:27, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Fwd: SB Courthouse tower clock now on the web
,
01/19/2011 18:37, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Subway Run Relative Motion Video
,
01/19/2011 18:56, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Fwd: SB Courthouse tower clock now on the web
,
01/19/2011 20:02, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/19/2011 20:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Fwd: SB Courthouse tower clock now on the web
,
01/19/2011 22:16, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] On Bob Boice's Exaggerated Demise
,
01/19/2011 23:12, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] A contrary view of Fwd: The humble physicist
,
01/20/2011 00:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] A contrary view of Fwd: The humble physicist
,
01/20/2011 10:39, Marty Weiss
[Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/20/2011 11:17, Donald Polvani
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/20/2011 11:21, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/20/2011 11:33, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/20/2011 12:02, Mason, Bruce A.
[Phys-l] Monty Hall on the Monty Hall problem
,
01/20/2011 12:19, marx
[Phys-l] robot to inspect/measure
,
01/20/2011 12:58, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] robot to inspect/measure
,
01/20/2011 13:24, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/20/2011 14:20, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/20/2011 14:35, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/20/2011 14:45, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] The dreaded error: 404
,
01/21/2011 02:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 07:11, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 07:54, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 08:58, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] journalism ( you can't trust anything you read)
,
01/21/2011 09:25, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] The dreaded error: 404
,
01/21/2011 12:24, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] journalism ( you can't trust anything you read)
,
01/21/2011 13:00, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] journalism ( you can't trust anything you read)
,
01/21/2011 13:41, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] journalism ( you can't trust anything you read)
,
01/21/2011 13:54, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] journalism ( you can't trust anything you read)
,
01/21/2011 15:17, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] journalism ( you can't trust anything you read)
,
01/21/2011 15:38, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 16:31, Donald Polvani
[Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 16:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 16:45, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 16:50, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 17:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 17:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 18:05, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 18:17, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 18:28, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 18:31, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 18:48, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 18:50, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 18:53, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] data ± model ± trust
,
01/21/2011 19:46, Vern Lindberg
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 19:47, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/21/2011 19:48, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/22/2011 12:25, John Denker
[Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions?
,
01/22/2011 20:16, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/23/2011 14:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/23/2011 15:10, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/23/2011 16:02, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/23/2011 16:37, Don McQuarrie
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/23/2011 16:43, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/23/2011 17:11, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/23/2011 18:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/24/2011 00:23, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Simulated Labs for General Physics Course
,
01/24/2011 09:36, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/24/2011 10:33, William Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/24/2011 12:24, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/24/2011 12:44, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/24/2011 16:10, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/24/2011 16:15, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/24/2011 16:26, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/24/2011 17:50, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Endless You and Endless Everything Else
,
01/24/2011 18:19, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] Endless You and Endless Everything Else Minor Corr
,
01/24/2011 18:45, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/24/2011 18:50, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/24/2011 22:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/24/2011 22:26, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] journalism
,
01/25/2011 01:19, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Science and the Simpsons
,
01/25/2011 08:32, Savinainen Antti
[Phys-l] curve of binding energy
,
01/25/2011 13:55, John Denker
[Phys-l] Research on Physics First
,
01/26/2011 11:55, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 16:36, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 17:11, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 17:12, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 17:17, William Robertson
[Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 17:17, Fakhruddin, Hasan
[Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 17:18, Fakhruddin, Hasan
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 17:41, John Denker
[Phys-l] Biofuel Generator
,
01/26/2011 18:05, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Biofuel Generator
,
01/26/2011 18:15, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 18:17, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 18:33, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 18:38, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 18:49, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 19:19, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] curve of binding energy
,
01/26/2011 19:46, Jacques Rutschmann
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 19:53, Aburr
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 20:05, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 20:07, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/26/2011 21:34, John Denker
[Phys-l] top posting
,
01/26/2011 21:34, John Denker
[Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/26/2011 22:05, Rman Towndog
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/26/2011 22:54, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/26/2011 23:14, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/26/2011 23:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] air pressure question
,
01/27/2011 00:06, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 00:22, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 02:00, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 07:34, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 09:24, Paul Lulai
[Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 10:13, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 11:38, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Biofuel Generator
,
01/27/2011 11:52, Kyle Forinash
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 12:08, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions -Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 12:21, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/27/2011 12:46, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 12:57, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Biofuel Generator
,
01/27/2011 13:01, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Biofuel Generator
,
01/27/2011 13:07, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions -Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 13:10, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] top posting
,
01/27/2011 13:15, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 13:18, FOUAD AJAMI
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 13:27, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 13:43, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 13:44, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 13:47, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 13:50, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 13:51, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 13:56, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 13:57, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 14:02, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 14:04, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 14:18, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 14:20, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 15:29, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 15:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 15:55, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 16:20, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 16:30, Arlyn DeBruyckere
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 16:42, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 16:44, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 16:54, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 16:57, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 17:13, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 18:07, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/27/2011 18:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions -Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 18:38, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 18:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 18:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 18:50, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] top posting
,
01/27/2011 18:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/27/2011 18:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 18:59, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Third Law of Thermodynamics
,
01/27/2011 19:00, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 19:26, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 19:27, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 19:36, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 20:14, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 20:14, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] top posting
,
01/27/2011 20:16, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 22:15, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 22:16, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 22:17, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 22:19, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/27/2011 22:20, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/27/2011 23:24, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/27/2011 23:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/28/2011 00:01, Wendy Adams
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/28/2011 09:15, Dr. Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] Is Newtonian Mechanics What Most Needs to be Known? (was How Much Value is Added. . . .)
,
01/28/2011 11:52, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Top-Posting
,
01/28/2011 12:39, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] Top-Posting
,
01/28/2011 13:45, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/28/2011 14:40, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/28/2011 16:14, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/28/2011 16:48, John Denker
[Phys-l] NAEP results in 12th grade for students who took PHYSICS
,
01/28/2011 17:12, Jane Jackson
Re: [Phys-l] Top-Posting
,
01/28/2011 18:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions -Response to Haim #2
,
01/28/2011 22:09, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions -Response to Haim #2
,
01/28/2011 22:39, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/28/2011 22:58, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] e: Top-Posting
,
01/29/2011 15:24, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/29/2011 18:17, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/29/2011 18:39, William Robertson
[Phys-l] Academically Adrift?
,
01/29/2011 19:50, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/29/2011 20:08, Woolf, Lawrence
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions-Response to Haim #2
,
01/29/2011 20:21, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions-Response to Haim #2
,
01/29/2011 20:55, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions-Response to Haim #2
,
01/29/2011 21:18, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/29/2011 22:18, Scott Orshan
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/29/2011 22:46, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions-Response to Haim #2
,
01/29/2011 22:52, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/29/2011 23:21, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions - Response to Haim #2
,
01/30/2011 00:18, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions-Response to Haim #2
,
01/30/2011 00:22, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions-Response to Haim #2
,
01/30/2011 00:40, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/30/2011 00:43, Marty Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/30/2011 00:48, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/30/2011 01:04, Stefan Jeglinski
[Phys-l] one electron
,
01/30/2011 10:22, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/30/2011 10:41, Mike Viotti
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/30/2011 10:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/30/2011 11:14, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] one electron
,
01/30/2011 11:28, chuck britton
[Phys-l] modern vs classical thermodynamics
,
01/30/2011 13:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] modern vs classical thermodynamics
,
01/30/2011 14:34, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Copy: [ap-physics] Wave Demonstrator on the Cheap
,
01/30/2011 17:14, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] mechanical (Applies to all, I presume.) on reflection question.
,
01/30/2011 17:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] mechanical (Applies to all, I presume.) on reflection question.
,
01/30/2011 19:07, brian whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] modern vs classical thermodynamics
,
01/30/2011 19:16, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] modern vs classical thermodynamics
,
01/30/2011 19:26, brian whatcott
[Phys-l] Soak Time [was Academically Adrift?]
,
01/30/2011 19:51, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] How Much Value is Added at Elite Institutions-Response to Haim #2
,
01/30/2011 20:07, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] mechanical (Applies to all, I presume.) on reflection question.
,
01/31/2011 01:18, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/31/2011 13:24, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/31/2011 14:16, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/31/2011 14:35, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/31/2011 15:01, Dr. Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] rich context luncheon meat
,
01/31/2011 16:33, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
01/31/2011 17:38, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
01/31/2011 17:54, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
01/31/2011 18:43, William Robertson
Re: [Phys-l] real-world mechanics problem
,
01/31/2011 19:35, John Denker
[Phys-l] peter pan apparatus -- simplified version
,
01/31/2011 19:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Any teaching tips
,
01/31/2011 22:29, Ken Fox
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc