Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Thanks. This is a really good addition to the 1999 paper.
Paul Lulai
Physics Teacher
St Anthony Village S.H.
3303 33rd Ave NE
St Anthony Village, MN 55418
612-706-1146
plulai@stanthony.k12.mn.us
http://www.stanthony.k12.mn.us/hsscience/ ;
-----Original Message-----
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of Zollman, Dean
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 8:37 PM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] PER Review Article?
I highly recommend a review paper written by Jennifer Docktor and Jose Mestre about one year ago. It was written for a National Academy committee and can be found at http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/DBER_Docktor_October_Paper.pdf
Dean Zollman
-----Original Message-----
From: David Craig [mailto:craigda@lemoyne.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:05 PM
To: phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
Cc: David Craig
Subject: [Phys-l] PER Review Article?
Would anyone care to suggest a recent review article (or even resource letter) on the current state, and especially, efficacy, of PER?
I have the famous resource letter from 1999, and am aware of "Reviews in PER" at per-central, among other things. I'm poking to see if there's anything important my google skills have missed.
Partial context: working to persuade our administration to support efforts to reform our introductory physics courses.
Thanks,
David Craig
<http://web.lemoyne.edu/~craigda/>
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l