Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
At 6:10 PM -0600 2/2/10, Hodges, Laurent [PHYSA] wrote:I enjoyed this municipal power cable site negotiating tale. About the difficulty of laying cables in wet situations, I should mention that people seemed to be able to provide telegraphic signals via submarine cable for 20 miles or so in the 60's, the 1860's that is: and over several thousand deeply submerged miles soon after. Gutta percha and copper seemed to figure in their construction.
Thirty years ago, soon after we built our passive solar home in Ames, Iowa, our municipal electric utility offered homeowners in our area to put the electric lines (then on poles) underground, for $300 per homeowner. We all jumped at the chance, and have never had the problem with ice other communities (or other parts of Ames) have. I think this is common in many new developments these days, and would recommend it highly.
_______________________________________________
Many years ago ('70's) there was a tale going around of some municipality pushing hard for underground utilities. Developers were of course opposed to it because of the higher up-front cost. Negotiations went back & forth -
Municipality: All utilities will be underground.
Developers: All utilities will be underground where feasible.
Municipality: All utilities will be underground unless it is found necessary to place water and sewerage on overhead poles.
In all fairness, underground power has had serious problems with ground water leakage up until the late '90's or so when PVC conduit began being used.