Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
If this energy shows up as KE of the byproducts, then I think a student
could legitimately ask "What force accelerated these byproducts to these
high speeds?" I don't see how associating energy with the system versus
the bonds helps the understanding of the chemistry. Simply reciting a
scenario where PE decreases and KE increases does not produce
understanding at a basic level - it's simply substituting a model for the
dynamics. (This is why I became frustrated with Chemistry as an undergrad
- too much scenario in the introductory courses.)
Bob at PC
-----Original Message-----lo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-
bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of John Clement
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:27 PM
To: 'Forum for Physics Educators'
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] internal/external conservative/nonconservative
forces!?!?
My example of bonds is very important to understanding chemistry.
Because
students will tell you there is energy in bonds and when you break them
you
get energy. So if you dissociate gasoline the student will tell you
that
releases energy. The student will tell you the same thing about the
Krebs
cycle. This misconception blocks understanding of chemical and
physical
reactions.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l