Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Cheating, a great argument against online courses.

From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:08:57 -0800

I, until now, wondered why Garrett Hardin had his staff photograph all his intro. students. He'd look thru them while he invigilated.

bc naive, and took (ca 1963) his grad course (one unit; one paper and discussion at his home) [the texts were The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and An Anthology of Partly Baked Ideas.]

On 2010, Nov 15, , at 16:19, John Clement wrote:

I have no idea how many ghost
test takers there were. But it seems that this happens even when the
professor probably has contact with the student in question.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] Cheating, a great argument against online courses.
  - From: "LaMontagne, Bob" <RLAMONT@providence.edu>

References:
- Re: [Phys-l] [physicsfirst] Research on Physics First
  - From: "M. Horton" <scitch@verizon.net>
- Re: [Phys-l] [physicsfirst] Research on Physics First
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>
- Re: [Phys-l] [physicsfirst] Research on Physics First
  - From: William Robertson <wrobert9@ix.netcom.com>
- [Phys-l] Cheating, a great argument against online courses.
  - From: "John Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Benford's Law.
Next by Date: [Phys-l] education bribery
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Cheating, a great argument against online courses.
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Cheating, a great argument against online courses.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread