Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] More Difficult to Read Text Leads to Better Retention #2



Hmmm...unfair? One of my earliest college class memories is the finiding that a tachistoscope can demonstrate that an image presented for a brief moment can be registered, unless the image invokes some social or personal barricade, in which case a MUCH longer presentation is needed for recognition.
That did not seem obvious then, or now.

Brian W


On 10/31/2010 9:00 PM, William Robertson wrote:
For what it's worth: As someone who has done research in cognitive
science, I always thought that research in psychology is largely
composed of demonstrating what we all know to be true. There are
anomalies, of course.

Bill


William C. Robertson, Ph.D.
Bill Robertson Science, Inc.
Stop Faking It! Finally Understanding Science So You Can Teach It.
wrobert9@ix.netcom.com
1340 Telemark Drive
Woodland Park, CO 80863
719-686-1609

On Oct 31, 2010, at 7:55 PM, Richard Hake wrote:

Some subscribers to Phys-L and Physoc might be interested in a post
"Re: More Difficult to Read Text Leads to Better Retention #2" [Hake
(2010)]. The abstract reads:

****************************************
ABSTRACT: In response to my post "Re: More Difficult to Read Text
Leads to Better Retention" EDDRA2's Keith Baker wrote :

"Bad fonts slow down reading which means that info has longer to get
processed into long term memory which improves memory of the info. .
. . . . . CP Snow was right. There is no need for physicists to
reinvent the wheel psychology discovered 100 years ago if there is
good education."

Two points:

1. I wonder if Baker could tell us *what* he thinks C.P. Snow
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._P._Snow> was right about?

2. Regarding physicists "reinventing the wheel psychology discovered
100 years ago":

a. The article "Fortune Favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects
of Disfluency on Educational Outcomes" [Oppenheimer et al. (2010)]
was authored by *psychologists* at Princeton and Indiana University.

b. Considering the probable insignificance of "difficult-to-read
fonts" to higher-order learning relative to "interactive engagement"
[Benezet (1935, 1936), Hake (1998a,b)], is the emphasis on fonts
actually a flat tire rather than a wheel? - see the signature quote.
****************************************

To access the complete 12 kB post please click on<http://bit.ly/cmFMZr
.
Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands
President, PEdants for Definitive Academic References which
Recognize the
Invention of the Internet (PEDARRII)
<rrhake@earthlink.net>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi>
<http://HakesEdStuff.blogspot.com>
<http://iub.academia.edu/RichardHake>

"It seems that in education, the wheel (more usually the flat tire)
must be reinvented every few decades"
Lee Shulman, as paraphrased by the late Arnold Arons (1986, p.
24):


REFERENCES [All URL's shortened by<http://bit.ly/> and accessed on
31 October 2010.]
Hake, R.R. 2010. "Re: More Difficult to Read Text Leads to Better
Retention #2," online on the OPEN! AERA-L archives at
<http://bit.ly/cmFMZr>. The abstract and link to the complete post
are being transmitted to various discussion lists and are also online
on my blog "Hake'sEdStuff" at<http://bit.ly/c040Lz>.

Oppenheimer, D.M., C.D. Yauman,& E.B. Vaughn. 2010. "Fortune Favors
the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of Disfluency on Educational
Outcomes," online at<http://bit.ly/cATcBK>.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l