Re: [Phys-l] Another try: Re: failure notice was Re: Test question

[marx@phy.ilstu.edu]

For those interested, RCH is a term you can look up in the urban slang
dictionary...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=R.C.H.

> yes, an RCH was an accepted term for 'just the tiniest bit', back in
> the '60's with HS in the Hills of E. Tenn.
>
> (Must not be a Calif term??)
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2009, at Aug 16(Sun) 4:25 , Bernard Cleyet wrote:
>
> > On 2009, Jul 11, , at 13:03, mail6.redshift.com@mail6.redshift.com
> > wrote:
> >
> > > OK!
> > >
> > > What does RCH signify?
> > >
> > > bc graduated from UCSB in 1959 and has never met RCH[, that he can
> > > remember.]
> > >
> > > On 2003, Jun 04, , at 10:32, Hugh Haskell wrote:
> > >
> > > > At 13:09 -0400 6/4/03, Herbert H Gottlieb wrote:
> > > > > I'm surprised that a professor of physics would be acquainted with
> > > > > a somewhat insider term used mainly by professional engineers when
> > > > > making precise measurements or formulating specifications for
> > > > > items not used in space travel.
> > > > Why? Anyone who grew up earlier than the 60s, and many since have
> > > > heard and used the term throughout school.
> > > >
> > > > Hugh
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Hugh Haskell
> > > > <mailto:haskell@ncssm.edu>
> > > > <mailto:hhaskell@mindspring.com>
> > > >
> > > > (919) 467-7610
> > > >
> > > > Never ask someone what computer they use. If they use a Mac, they
> > > > will tell you. If not, why embarrass them?
> > > >                         --Douglas Adams
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Forum for Physics Educators
> > Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> > https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l