Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

[Phys-l] radiation cancers?



Hi,

I've gotten myself really confused I think. Here is data from Chernobyl used to calculate radiation risk. (Cancers, not death rate.)

Chernobyl data:

Dose(Sv)/Victims/Expected cancers/Actual cancers/Excess cancers
<0.01 42,702 4267 4286 19
0.01-0.1 21,479 2191 2223 32
0.1-0.2 5307 574 599 25
0.2-0.5 5858 623 759 136
0.5-1.0 2882 289 418 129
1.0-2.0 1444 140 273 133
>2 300 23 55 32

A plot of Dose vs excess/victims has slope ~0.45 cancers/Sv exposure.

Assuming a linear dose model we can calculate the number of cancers due to a given exposure.

Annual US average exposure is ~3.6mSv/year (~3mSv natural) so 304x10^6 people x 0.45cancers/Sv x 3.6mSv = 492000 cancers (rate of 0.00162) caused by radiation. Total cancer rate (CDC) is ~0.00475 or 1.4x10^6/year. So radiation cancers are 34% of the total?

That can't be right can it?

What did I get wrong?

kyle
--
------------------------------------------
"When applied to material things,
the term "sustainable growth" is an oxymoron."
Albert Bartlett

kyle forinash 812-941-2039
kforinas@ius.edu
http://Physics.ius.edu/
-----------------------------------------