Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] FREE new book by Sheila Tobias on HS science teaching profession



If you reply to this long (8 kB) post please don't hit the reply button unless you prune the copy of this post that may appear in your reply down to a few relevant lines, otherwise the entire already archived post may be needlessly resent to subscribers.

*************************************
ABSTRACT: Jane Jackson, in a Physoc post of 1 July 2009, calls attention to Tobias & Baffert's (2009) FREE online book "Science Teaching as a Profession: Why It Isn't, How It Could Be." I join Jane in urging teachers to (a) read the Tobias/Baffert book, and (b) work collectively to promote increased professionalism in high-school science teaching, one of the country's most vital occupations. Biologist James Gentile, in a Huffington Post article at <http://tinyurl.com/nh2uo2> provides an excellent review of Tobias & Baffert (2009) in the context of "Improving Science Teaching in America's Schools."
*************************************

Jane Jackson (2009), in a PHYSOC post of 1 Jul 2009 with the above subject title, wrote:

"Sheila Tobias has a new book, FREE online: 'Science Teaching as a Profession: Why It Isn't How It Could Be' [Tobias & Baffert (2009)]. She wrote it with a high school science teacher. I strongly encourage you to read it! It will empower you to make a positive difference collectively. Download it at <http://www.rescorp.org> (halfway down the webpage)."

I join with Jane in urging science teachers to (a) read Tobias & Baffert's (2009) book, and (b) work collectively to promote increased professionalism in high-school science teaching, one of the country's most vital occupations.

My only curmudgeonly reservation is that Tobias & Baffert's online book doesn't take full advantage of *hot-linking* - that precious gift of physicist-turned-computer-scientist Tim Berners-Lee that allows material to be brought to the reader's screen with the click of a mouse.

For more on Tobias & Baffert (2009) see "High-School Science Teaching as a Profession" [Hake (2009)], and biologist James Gentile's (2009) "Improving Science Teaching in America's Schools."

Gentile <http://www.biochem.arizona.edu/faculty/profiles/gentile.htm> is:

(a) president and CEO of the Research Corporation for Science Advancement <http://www.rescorp.org> publisher of Tobias & Baffert (2009);

(b) co-author with William Wood of the perceptive review "Teaching in a research context" [Wood & Gentile (2003)];

(c) a regular contributor to the Huffington Post - see <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-m-gentile>.


Gentile wrote (slightly edited, bracketed by lines "GGGGGGG. . . ."):

GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
In a fascinating new book by noted education writer Sheila Tobias and veteran science teacher Anne Baffert, entitled "Science Teaching as a Profession: Why It Isn't, How It Could Be," the authors make a startling discovery. Based on their communications with nearly 500 science teachers across the United States over the past two years, they found that attrition by U.S. high-school science teachers is not primarily a function of money. More pressing are concerns about loss of autonomy, control, and stature.

Among their key findings are the following - Science teachers want:

a. more autonomy over how and what they teach, including the sequencing of specific topic areas and the selection of textbooks. Great teaching is intensely personal; the less the teaching can be personalized the less impactful it is.

b. more control in terms of the extent to which they are allowed to teach in their own area of specialty (biology vs. physics, for instance) and are able to influence school policy by participating in policy deliberations. They are also concerned about the loss of control over student assessment. Such assessment used to be the prerogative of teachers; increasingly it is too much determined by student performance in "high-stakes testing."

c. to be considered professionals - appreciated for their expertise; trusted for their judgment; valued by school administrators and society more broadly.
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of Deventer, The Netherlands.
<rrhake@earthlink.net>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/>
<http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/>
<http://HakesEdStuff.blogspot.com/>

REFERENCES [Tiny URL's courtesy <http://tinyurl.com/create.php>.]
Gentile, J.M. 2009. "Improving Science Teaching in America's Schools," Huffington Post, 9 June; online at <http://tinyurl.com/nh2uo2>, along with 23 comments as of 3 July 2009 12:46:00-0700.

Hake, R.R. 2009. "High-School Science Teaching as a Profession," AERA-B post of 9 May 2009 09:02:53-0700; online on the OPEN! AERA-B archives at <http://tinyurl.com/nj8l69>.

Jackson, J. 2009. "Re: FREE new book by Sheila Tobias on HS science teaching profession," PHYSOC post of 1 Jul 2009 06:41:26-0700; online at <http://tinyurl.com/kungw5>.

Tobias, S. & A. Baffert. 2009. "Science Teaching as a Profession: Why It Isn't How It Could Be." Research Corporation for Science Advancement. Currently FREE online as a 1.3 MB pdf at <http://www.rescorp.org>. The book's website is <http://www.science-teaching-as-a-profession.com>.

Wood, W.B., & J.M. Gentile. 2003. "Teaching in a research context," Science 302: 1510; 28 November; online to subscribers at <http://www.sciencemag.org/content/vol302/issue5650/index.shtml - policyforum>. A summary is online to all at <http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/302/5650/1510>.