Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Reactors (was: Global Temperatures)

From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 23:19:42 -0700

As I've posted, I reduced my electric bill to 1/2 of ... by replacing ALL the indoor incandescent w/ CFLs. Now COSTCO sells LEDs for ~ $11. 45 W equivalent incandescent is 5 W. Claimed life is 30 k h.

bc waiting to see if Calif. Gov. will subsidize, as did CFLs.

On 2009, Apr 06, , at 22:41, Hugh Haskell wrote:

and a dramatic increase in efficiency can meet all
of our new power needs for the next twenty years. This is a very
doable thing. California has kept its per capita energy use nearly
constant for 35 years,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Reactors (was: Global Temperatures)
  - From: "David T. Marx" <marx@phy.ilstu.edu>
- Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Reactors (was: Global Temperatures)
  - From: "Bill Nettles" <bnettles@uu.edu>

References:
- [Phys-l] Nuclear Reactors (was: Global Temperatures)
  - From: Hugh Haskell <hhaskell@mindspring.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Inductive cooking
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] Inductive cooking
Previous by thread: [Phys-l] Nuclear Reactors (was: Global Temperatures)
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] Nuclear Reactors (was: Global Temperatures)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread