Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
From: LaMontagne, Bob <RLAMONT@providence.edu>
Subject: RE: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
To: rcarlson@physicstoolkit.com, "Forum for Physics Educators" <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 7:42 PM
Notice that a "well-established, scientific
answer" was not given - only a snarky comment.
Bob at PC
________________________________
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu on behalf
of Robert Carlson
Sent: Tue 3/10/2009 7:22 PM
To: phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu; appell@nasw.org
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it Controversial?
Well, does the fossil in fossil fuels suggest ancient
lifeforms, or something else other than lifeforms?
--- On Tue, 3/10/09, David Appell <appell@nasw.org>
wrote:
From: David Appell <appell@nasw.org>Controversial?
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] Climate Change - Is it
To: phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.eduwhat
Cc: rcarlson@physicstoolkit.com
Date: Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 5:47 PM
Robert Carlson wrote:
First, let's start the discussion by defining
fossil fuels are. Someone?have
Fossil fuels are those that contain ancient (~50 Mya)
carbon.
Can we please avoid such diversionary tactics that
well-established, scientific answers?_______________________________________________
David
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l