Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Textbooks vs multimedia



Sometimes "common sense is not true. It's comforting to know when CS is confirmed by a well designed study.

bc


On 2009, Feb 09, , at 11:16, Rauber, Joel wrote:

John C. wrote in part:


| So elaborate color illustrations are probably worse than more
| sparse black and white figures. Pages with extra things that
| distract from the text
| (sidebars...) probably provide too many distracting elements.
| Concept presentation needs to be reversed to conform to the
| learning cycle. Problem solving needs to stress the use of
| concept based problem solving. So students need to solve
| kinematic problems primarily with graphs and maps before
| being introduced to the equations. Bar charts need to be
| stressed in energy, and their usage should be part of problem
| solving and not just decorative illustrations. Textbook
| authors need to have looked at and understood both cognitive
| research and science education research

It strikes me that the above comments mesh well with common sense. I've been railing for well over a decade or two about how distracting textbooks were becoming; to the point where in many books its almost impossible to tell where the main narrative lies.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l