Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] COLD FUSION



Yes, but it interested me.

bc


On 2009, Dec 18, , at 23:36, scitch@verizon.net wrote:

Sorry everyone, I cannot get used to the fact that "reply" functions like "reply to all" on this list. Doesn't make any sense.

Obviously, that message was just intended for Ludwik.

Mike



Dec 19, 2009 07:12:46 AM, phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu wrote:

===========================================

Dr. Kowalski;

A couple of questions:

1) First, I was thinking that we were expecting to get more pits on the chip exposed to the reaction than the one exposed to the atmosphere. But, if these are alpha particles, would they be able to penetrate the thick plastic tube that I used for my electrolysis vessel? Is the fact that we got any pits at all on the test chip evidence that the reaction is producing particles? Or do we actually need more pits on the test chips than on the control chips?

2) If we are supposed to get more pits on the test chips, would it be possible for you to send us a complete setup? I'd be happy to reimburse you for the materials, CR-39, and shipping. His science fair project would be much better if he got some positive results.

Thanks,
Mike and Mikey


cut