Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] size controversy



Wikipedia's pages support the claim that He has a smaller radius than H (at least Van der Waals' radius):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_radii_of_the_elements_%28data_page%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_radius#Empirically_measured_atomic_radii
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_radius#Calculated_atomic_radii

Is the leakage you refer to an actual physical leakage (i.e. diffusion) of gas into or out of the tubes?

/************************************
Down with categorical imperative!
flutzpah@yahoo.com
************************************/




________________________________
From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
To: Forum Physics Educators <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>
Sent: Thu, December 3, 2009 10:15:10 AM
Subject: [Phys-l] size controversy

W / o resorting to the authority of Google to settle the dispute on
tap-l, I appeal to the wisdom of phys-l. (especially the chemist
among us)

Which has a larger atomic radius H or He? The question relates to
leakage in spectrum tubes. One claims goes smaller left to right
(greater Z in nucleus) while another appeals to greater electronic
shielding, Both ignore a possible effect of a "filled" shell.

bc even too lazy to look in his Eisberg & Resnick "Quantum Physics"
and read Schiff over 50 years ago


p.s. Is assuming energy equipartition important in leakage?
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l