Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of November, 2009
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] motion problem
,
11/02/2009 02:53, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 03:15, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] motion problem
,
11/02/2009 07:29, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] motion problem
,
11/02/2009 07:32, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 07:36, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Need advice about Radiant Energy Tesla, Gray, Moray....
,
11/02/2009 07:42, CARABAJAL PEREZ, MARCIAL ROBERTO
Re: [Phys-l] Need advice about Radiant Energy Tesla, Gray, Moray....
,
11/02/2009 07:54, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Geometry, Energy, Entropy and the Evolution of the Hubble Parameter
,
11/02/2009 08:39, Spinozalens
[Phys-l] research project--software-based homework systems
,
11/02/2009 09:38, Price Daniel S.
Re: [Phys-l] Buoyancy (was: motion problem)
,
11/02/2009 09:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Buoyancy (was: motion problem)
,
11/02/2009 10:25, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 10:27, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] research project--software-based homework systems
,
11/02/2009 10:31, David E. T. Clark
Re: [Phys-l] motion problem
,
11/02/2009 10:37, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 10:59, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 11:13, Crawford MacCallum
Re: [Phys-l] Buoyancy (was: motion problem)
,
11/02/2009 11:41, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] motion problem
,
11/02/2009 11:49, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 11:51, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 12:23, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Need advice about Radiant Energy Tesla, Gray, Moray....
,
11/02/2009 12:35, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] research project--software-based homework systems
,
11/02/2009 13:55, David E. T. Clark
[Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 14:34, Peter Schoch
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 14:59, Richard L. Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 15:00, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 15:01, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 15:06, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 15:40, Peter Schoch
Re: [Phys-l] research project--software-based homework systems
,
11/02/2009 16:10, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] research project--software-based homework systems
,
11/02/2009 17:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/02/2009 18:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 18:13, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/02/2009 22:21, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 01:11, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 01:14, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] It appears the Republican War on Science continues, but is more a guerilla war.
,
11/03/2009 01:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 07:28, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 08:19, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 10:42, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 10:52, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 11:23, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] research project--software-based homework systems
,
11/03/2009 12:43, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 12:45, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 13:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 13:06, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 15:51, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 19:49, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 20:03, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 20:14, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 20:16, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 20:27, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 20:32, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 20:41, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 20:44, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 21:01, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 21:13, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 21:17, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 21:23, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 21:26, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 21:44, Crawford MacCallum
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 21:46, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 21:52, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/03/2009 21:57, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/03/2009 22:06, Brian Blais
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/03/2009 22:18, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Do UK scientists have more backbone than "us"? Was: The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/03/2009 22:54, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/03/2009 23:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/04/2009 06:10, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/04/2009 07:20, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 07:41, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 08:07, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 08:26, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 08:43, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 09:18, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 09:53, Vern Lindberg
[Phys-l] race car spoiler
,
11/04/2009 09:55, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] race car spoiler
,
11/04/2009 10:09, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/04/2009 10:16, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/04/2009 10:16, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 10:33, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/04/2009 10:37, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 11:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] race car spoiler
,
11/04/2009 11:57, John SOHL
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 12:28, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] accurate numerical solution of equations of motion
,
11/04/2009 12:42, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 12:45, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] race car spoiler
,
11/04/2009 13:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 13:24, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Linear Air Drag
,
11/04/2009 13:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 13:38, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 13:45, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 13:54, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] The Republican "war on science" has moved to the UK.
,
11/04/2009 13:56, John Clement
[Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 14:14, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 14:46, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 15:05, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 15:37, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 15:44, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 15:55, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 16:08, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 17:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 19:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 19:26, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 19:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 19:41, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 19:59, Wes Davis
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 20:25, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 22:29, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 22:36, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 22:45, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/04/2009 22:56, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/04/2009 23:40, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/04/2009 23:46, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] physics of dissipation
,
11/04/2009 23:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 00:02, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 01:35, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 01:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 05:26, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 07:07, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 07:30, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 08:03, Michael Porter
[Phys-l] radius of curvature of elliptical orbit
,
11/05/2009 09:19, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 10:04, trappe
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 10:25, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 10:40, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 11:02, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 12:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 12:43, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Fwd: Atmospheric Optics - Gallery Exhibition of Images BE
,
11/05/2009 12:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 14:56, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 15:28, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] moon illusion measurement
,
11/05/2009 16:36, WC Maddox
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/05/2009 19:57, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/06/2009 09:47, Edmiston, Mike
Re: [Phys-l] [PHYSHARE] contradiction on microwave ovens
,
11/06/2009 10:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] posted on X (no units)
,
11/06/2009 11:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] posted on X (no units)
,
11/06/2009 11:35, marx
[Phys-l] That controversial motion question.
,
11/06/2009 11:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] posted on X (no units)
,
11/06/2009 11:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] [PHYSHARE] contradiction on microwave ovens
,
11/06/2009 12:03, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/06/2009 12:55, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] singular limits (was: no units)
,
11/06/2009 13:16, John Denker
[Phys-l] Vibration Isolation Specifications
,
11/06/2009 13:42, David Craig
Re: [Phys-l] posted on X (no units)
,
11/06/2009 13:44, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] [PTSOS] Re: posted on X (no units)
,
11/06/2009 14:31, Dean Baird
Re: [Phys-l] singular limits (was: no units)
,
11/06/2009 17:37, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/06/2009 18:25, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] format for lab reports
,
11/06/2009 18:38, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] singular limits
,
11/06/2009 18:47, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] MIT's online lectures
,
11/07/2009 09:21, Patricia T Viele
[Phys-l] MIT's online lectures (fwd)
,
11/07/2009 18:07, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Vibration Isolation Specifications
,
11/11/2009 08:28, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Gravity
,
11/12/2009 16:39, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Gravity
,
11/12/2009 22:55, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/13/2009 08:27, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/13/2009 11:45, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Adding a dissipation term.
,
11/13/2009 12:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/13/2009 12:36, Souder Dwight
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/13/2009 14:11, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/13/2009 14:35, Richard A. Lindgren
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/14/2009 03:02, Leon de Oliveira
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/14/2009 10:18, John Denker
[Phys-l] Position Available
,
11/14/2009 15:25, David Abineri
[Phys-l] Position Available
,
11/14/2009 15:29, David Abineri
[Phys-l] Cold Fusion
,
11/15/2009 11:15, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] The Cosmological Constant from Ricci Dark Energy
,
11/15/2009 18:37, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] The Cosmological Constant from Ricci Dark Energy
,
11/15/2009 19:43, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The Cosmological Constant from Ricci Dark Energy
,
11/15/2009 21:47, Spinozalens
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/16/2009 13:25, Josh Gates
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/16/2009 14:10, bennett bennett
[Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/16/2009 17:03, Carl Mungan
[Phys-l] Laws of motion with constant acceleration (was projectile motion)
,
11/16/2009 17:46, David Willey
[Phys-l] Misconceptions in the Population/Energy Debate #2
,
11/16/2009 18:28, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/16/2009 18:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/16/2009 19:08, Roger Haar
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/16/2009 19:57, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] What's happening here?
,
11/16/2009 20:09, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Misconceptions in the Population/Energy Debate #2
,
11/16/2009 21:31, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Misconceptions in the Population/Energy Debate #2
,
11/16/2009 21:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Laws of motion with constant acceleration (was projectile motion)
,
11/17/2009 02:06, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 08:17, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 08:50, curtis osterhoudt
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 09:38, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 10:56, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 11:27, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 13:09, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 14:00, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/17/2009 19:44, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Science show "Humanly Impossible" on National Geographic channel.
,
11/17/2009 21:23, David Willey
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/18/2009 00:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Science show "Humanly Impossible" on National Geographicchannel.
,
11/18/2009 08:35, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Science show "Humanly Impossible" on National Geographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 08:42, Sam Sampere
[Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on National Geographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 08:51, Sam Sampere
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 09:05, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 09:14, Michael Meyer
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 09:30, Sam Sampere
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 09:55, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" onNationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 10:07, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 10:22, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/18/2009 10:57, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 11:24, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Science show "Humanly Impossible" on National Geographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 13:13, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/18/2009 13:23, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 14:06, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] FW: Science show "Humanly Impossible" on NationalGeographic channel.
,
11/18/2009 14:22, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/18/2009 18:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/18/2009 20:34, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/18/2009 22:37, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 00:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/19/2009 08:57, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 09:13, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 10:57, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] International Commission Newsletter
,
11/19/2009 11:29, Zollman, Dean
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 11:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 11:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 12:07, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 12:32, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 13:30, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Which is the most E efficient?
,
11/19/2009 13:33, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/21/2009 15:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/21/2009 16:44, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/21/2009 19:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/22/2009 16:39, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/22/2009 18:49, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/22/2009 23:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 04:38, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 07:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 10:35, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 12:21, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 12:42, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] proliferation of particle paranoia
,
11/23/2009 13:03, Stefan Jeglinski
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 13:06, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 16:03, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field -- erratum
,
11/23/2009 16:40, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 17:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 18:16, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 19:26, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 19:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 19:55, David Bowman
[Phys-l] Winding a transformer (was induced electric field)
,
11/23/2009 20:18, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The value of email discussion lists
,
11/23/2009 23:36, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/23/2009 23:40, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 06:28, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 07:20, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 07:28, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 09:26, Philip Keller
[Phys-l] About galvanometer in Wheatstone bridge
,
11/24/2009 10:04, CARABAJAL PEREZ, MARCIAL ROBERTO
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 10:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] About galvanometer in Wheatstone bridge
,
11/24/2009 11:46, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 12:46, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] About galvanometer in Wheatstone bridge
,
11/24/2009 12:52, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 12:56, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 13:00, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 14:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] About galvanometer in Wheatstone bridge
,
11/24/2009 15:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 15:13, John Denker
[Phys-l] CAD style class for high school science
,
11/24/2009 15:35, Souder Dwight
[Phys-l] Large Hadron Collider is Operational
,
11/24/2009 16:23, marx
Re: [Phys-l] About galvanometer in Wheatstone bridge
,
11/24/2009 20:25, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 20:46, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 20:48, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 21:00, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 21:30, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/24/2009 23:58, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] fluids kit
,
11/25/2009 02:49, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/25/2009 07:44, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] science jokes
,
11/25/2009 09:58, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/25/2009 16:53, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/25/2009 21:04, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/26/2009 07:36, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/26/2009 11:59, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/26/2009 14:55, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/26/2009 15:59, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/26/2009 16:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/26/2009 16:37, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/26/2009 21:27, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/26/2009 23:33, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/27/2009 03:49, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/27/2009 08:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] The weaknesses of email discussion lists
,
11/27/2009 13:05, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] The weaknesses of email discussion lists - ERRATUM
,
11/27/2009 13:39, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/27/2009 14:38, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Structure of Matter
,
11/27/2009 16:43, alex brown
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/27/2009 21:25, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/27/2009 22:20, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/27/2009 22:53, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] Castles in the Sky
,
11/27/2009 23:15, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/28/2009 11:37, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/28/2009 13:25, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/28/2009 13:35, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/28/2009 14:35, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Castles in the Sky #2
,
11/28/2009 14:44, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/28/2009 14:52, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/28/2009 19:17, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] A challenge.
,
11/28/2009 22:04, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] constructing perpendiculars in D dimensions
,
11/29/2009 07:26, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] induced electric field
,
11/29/2009 16:41, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] constructing perpendiculars in D dimensions
,
11/30/2009 06:49, Joel Berlinghieri
Re: [Phys-l] constructing perpendiculars in D dimensions
,
11/30/2009 10:30, David Bowman
Re: [Phys-l] constructing perpendiculars in D dimensions
,
11/30/2009 12:27, John Denker
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc