Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Holographic Dark Energy in Induced Gravity Trying Again



The intent of my question was to help you give meaning to yours. Not every sentence that parses in English makes sense in physics.
Regards,
Jack

"Trust me. I have a lot of experience at this."
General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley




On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Brian Whatcott wrote:

Dunno.

I imagine you would need to ask Kwan at U Sydney on that....
My personal reservations center on the convenient suspension of disbelief
about the limiting role of c at the so-called initial expansion moment,
the puzzling aspects of dark matter /energy and so on.
Brian W

Jack Uretsky wrote:
What would such evidence look like? Or, put another way, what
presently unsnswerable question could be answered by the unprovable
assumption that there is matter outside of the observable universe?
Regards,
Jack


On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Brian Whatcott wrote:


Is there evidence for energy and matter greater than can be accounted
for in the observable universe?
Brian W

Embarq Customer wrote:

The 'Party Line' response that I have heard to questions such as this is that the 'larger separations' that you refer to don't exist.

[Brian]
As the universe is expanding at an accelerating pace, so that the
"furthest" light we can see is from 13 Bly or thereabouts,
and more distant light never can reach us,
is there an accounting for the mass and dark energy at these
larger separations?

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l