Corine Coniglio (2008), in her POD post titled "art of teaching," wrote:
"I am working on a project related to the "art of teaching," or
"teaching as an art," and I welcome your suggestions for sources
related to this topic. . . . . How does the art of teaching mesh with
the science of teaching?. . . . "
In parts I and II of "Can Scientific Research Enhance the Art of
Teaching?" [Hake (2007)] I surveyed some opinions on "teaching as an
art" vs "teaching as a science" [bracketed by lines "HHHH. . . ."]:
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I. PROPONENTS OF THE "ART OF TEACHING" - 1899 TO 1983
"Psychology is a science, and teaching is a art; and sciences never
generate arts directly out of themselves. An intermediary inventive
mind must make the application, by using its originality."
William James (1899)
"Teaching, I say, is an art, and not a science. . . in no sense can
teaching be said to be a science."
Floyd Richtmyer (1933) [referenced in Hestenes (1979)]
"This book is called 'The Art of Teaching' because I believe that
teaching is an art, not a science."
Gilbert Highet (1950) [referenced in Hestenes (1979)]
"After more than two-score years [Richtmyer's statement] has not been
proven wrong."
Ralph Goodwin (1978) [referenced in Hestenes (1979)]
"Teachers are more like orchestra conductors than technicians. They
need rules of thumb and educational imagination, not scientific
prescriptions."
Elliot Eisner (1983)
II. TEACHING IS BOTH AN ART AND A SCIENCE
"Let us agree at the outset that good teaching is an art, fully
deserving our respect and admiration. It does not follow, however, as
Goodwin seems to think, that there cannot also be a science of
teaching. . . . . . Medical practice is widely acknowledged to be an
art, but who doubts the possibility of medical science? Is teaching
so different because it ministers to the mind?"
David Hestenes (1979)
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I shall forego details of the remaining parts of "Can Scientific
Research Enhance the Art of Teaching?":
III. Can Science Improve Teaching Effectiveness?
IV. Development of Multiple-Choice Tests of Higher-Level Learning
V. University Leaders Bemoan the Inertia of Higher Education: Why Is
It So Slow To Recognize the Value of Interactive Engagement Methods
in Promoting Higher-Level Learning?
VI. Why Should We Be Concerned with Student Learning?
VII. Epilogue: Form the BIG BANG to the Possible Life on Planet Earth Bust.
Highet, G. 1950. "The Art of Teaching" Alfred A. Knopf. Now available
in a 1989 Vintage edition; Amazon.com information at
<http://tinyurl.com/2eom35>.
James, W. 1899. "Talks to Teachers On Psychology and To Students on
Some of Life's Ideals." Henry Holt & Co, esp. Chapter 1 "Psychology
and the Teaching Art," online at
<http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/tt1.html>.
Richtmyer, F.K. 1933. "Physics is Physics," Am. J. Phys. 1(1): 2-5;
online to subscribers at <http://tinyurl.com/364ns6>.