Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Limrick



Much worse than that - it down't scan!
Regards,
Jack



On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, Bob Sciamanda wrote:

The numerical equality embodied in the limerick is correct, so long as "log"
is interpreted as a "Natural Logarithm", i.e., "LN" (the logarithm to the
base "e". Conventionally, "log" refers to the base 10. Also, the comma
following the word "cosine" is mathematically misleading/confusing and
should be omitted.

Bob Sciamanda
Physics, Edinboro Univ of PA (Em)
trebor@winbeam.com
http://www.winbeam.com/~trebor/
----- Original Message -----
From: "chuck britton" <britton@ncssm.edu>
To: "Forum for Physics Educators" <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:57 PM
Subject: [Phys-l] Limrick


The integral of zee-squared dee zee,
From 1 to the cube root of 3,
Times the cosine,
Of 3 pi over 9,
Is the log of the cube root of e.

isn't there a negative sign missing somewhere?

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l


_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l


--
"Trust me. I have a lot of experience at this."
General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley