Chronology |
Current Month |
Current Thread |
Current Date |

[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |

*From*: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>*Date*: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:55:13 -0700

By the way, in case it wasn't obvious:

The Poynting vector is not well behaved with respect to special relativity.

It is not part of any four-vector.

Of course the same can be said of the E-vector and the B-vector; they

are not well behaved either.

The Poynting vector can be expressed as the spacelike rows of the timelike

column of a 4x4 matrix "T". The other row in that column is the Poynting

energy density. In particular, if we have observer with 4-velocity u, then

T(u) is 4-vector representing the energy density and energy-flow density.

The components of T are spelled out here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_stress-energy_tensor

The spacelike part of the stress-energy tensor is the plain old stress tensor.

This is the same sort of stress tensor that you encounter in the theory of

elasticity, or in fluid dynamics.

This electromagnetic stress is what you observed when you were 10 years old,

playing with a magnet and iron filings: There is tension along each field

line and repulsion between field lines.

The xy component of stress is the flow (in the x direction) of the y-component

of momentum (or vice versa).

Promoting the 3x3 stress tensor to a 4x4 stress-energy tensor gives a

relativistically correct picture of what's going on.

**References**:**[Phys-l] Poynting Vector***From:*"Jeffrey Schnick" <JSchnick@Anselm.Edu>

**Re: [Phys-l] Poynting Vector***From:*Tom Sandin <sandint@ncat.edu>

**Re: [Phys-l] Poynting Vector***From:*chuck britton <britton@ncssm.edu>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] Poynting Vector** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Phys-l] Poynting Vector** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] Poynting Vector** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Phys-l] Poynting Vector** - Index(es):