Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
-----Original Message-----
From: phys-l-bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu [mailto:phys-l-
bounces@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu] On Behalf Of John Denker
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 3:13 AM
To: Forum for Physics Educators
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] football orientation in flight ERRATUM
On 05/21/2008 10:19 PM, I wrote:
Disclaimer: This is probably quite a complicated phenomenon. It isvery,
very easy to get the wrong answer in situations like this.
I got that part right. I should have quit while I was ahead.
Having said that, here's the first hypothesis that occurs to me, andit seems
to fit the facts.
Actually my hypothesis does *not* fit the facts. I got the direction
wrong on the Magnus force, and therefore (unless I made ANOTHER
mistake)
my previous conclusion was diametrically wrong.
When correctly analyzed, the effect I identified makes a _negative_
contribution to the angle-of-attack stability.
I have no idea how to explain the observed stability. It is easy to
guess that some other effect makes a larger contribution in the
direction
of positive stability ... but I have no idea what effect that would
be.
Sorry for causing confusion.
============
The following reference is not much help, either:
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1046/j.1460-
2687.2002.00106.x
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l