Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:11 AM, Marty Weiss wrote:
Thousands of artists over hundreds of years are all wrong?
Leonardo, DaVinci, Monet, Renoir, Picasso, Ms. Kennedy (my 9th grade
art teacher), and so on? were they all wrong?
You're suggesting that these artists believed that red, yellow and
blue were the only three colours of paint necessary to create their
works, and that they did so. This is obviously not the case -- most
artists (the non-digital ones) use a variety of pigments, not just
three. Maybe an art teacher, discussing the theory of colour, would
worry about primary colours -- I doubt Renoir did.
I always thought that a casual glance at the true subtractive
primaries might lead to the misconception -- cyan looks blue, magenta
is kind of red...
Or maybe artists are just not that efficient. If you want to create
any colour that the eye can perceive (or the brain, if you want to
revive that argument from CHEMED-L), then C+M+Y (+black to thicken
things up) is the *least* number of colours necessary. How many
painters do you know have just those colours on their palette?
Mike
---
Michael Porter
Colonel By Secondary School
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l