Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy



Come on, this isn't really rocket science, but you reply as if it were. You quibble over semantics but in reality it is a serious problem. The public will support building a sports stadium using hundreds of millions in tax dollars but will reject a school budget over a few thousand dollars for a lunch program or a science lab. The general public is numerically illiterate when it comes to things that affect them locally but can recite numbers and statistics about things that have liittle or no immediate effect over their lives: the latest is the value of Michael Jackson's estate and will it be sold off. Who cares? Evidently thousands of people care, judging from the responses on the afternoon talk tv shows. . One hundred thousand people will go out into the pouring rain to see a professional football game, but will not drive five minutes to vote on school boards or council. When the paper reports on salary negotiations with a star player they get hundreds of letters, but when the paper reports on the state test scores or SAT scores for all the districts in an area, nary a peep from the same people.
How much did some diva's dress cost at the oscars? exciting news for millions of viewers. Cost of the Superconductor at Fermi lab? boring to most.
very discouraging.


Marty



John M Clement wrote:

Numerically illiterate is not innumeracy. Technically numeracy is the understanding of numbers, not literacy in particular areas such as geographical numbers... While understanding things like the budget requires both interest in the budget and numeracy. The US budget does not impinge on daily life so it is fairly irrelevant to most people. Also the population of a given area is generally irrelevant to common every day life.

People generally can not tell you where the names for the days of the week came from, the time it takes for light to travel from the sun to the Earth, the location of Austria, the date (within 20 years) of the Civil War, the name of the secretary of state... All of these are illiteracy, but not innumeracy. How many can name the composer of La Boheme? Or where did Dante put Lucifer? What colors are a Monarch butterfly? Or how about the sign "Ye olde coffe shop", how was it pronounced in old English? "The olde coffe shop", because the Y was originally a thorn, with a dot over the y, which was an old English letter pronounced th.

It depends on what you wish to define as being literate, and in what context. While numeracy is important to understanding many numbers in context, it is really a separate thing from knowing specific numbers. Anyone who is numerate can understant how many millions are in a billion, but may not know the national budget numbers.

John M. Clement
Houston, TX




Think of it this way.... ask the man on the street about points or salaries in any sport and he can talk your ears off about over/under, point spread betting on the game, how much money the wide receiver gets, the longest field goal ever made, and a host of other trivial (to us) nonsense. But, ask him about the local school budget or how much money is allocated for a highway project, or even money spent daily on the war, and you will get blank stares.

This entire country is numerically illiterate except for sports trivia!

This happens every day at the gym I go to. If the conversation is on sports it draws a dozen people. Once someone turns to any other topic involving numbers most of them drift away.

Marty

Rick Tarara wrote:


Common now John, the population of the country you live in, the world you live on, that cities have millions of people--thus is not specialized knowledge. These numbers effect almost every field of study--if only to estimate how many books your memoirs might sell! You are sounding like an apologist for ignorance. ;-(

Rick

----- Original Message ----- From: "John M Clement" <clement@hal-pc.org>



This question is not a test of innumeracy, except possibly at the ends
of the spectrum. It is a test of crystallized knowledge. A real test
for numeracy is to have people compare numbers like 0.5 and 3/8. The
population of a given area is what might be called common shared
knowledge.

_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l




_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l


_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l