Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Don't confuse references with referees.
On Feb 4, 2008 10:58 AM, Jack Uretsky <jlu@hep.anl.gov> wrote:
Does anyone know who has "generally agreed" that this work is "all wet"?_______________________________________________
Apparently, at least one referee has not so agreed, unless the author of
"this work" is misrepresenting his sources. See
Phys.Rev.A49:678-694,1994 (Rueda and Haisch)
Regards,
Jack
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Bernard Cleyet wrote:
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/BS-GR.pdf
bc doesn't want to continue reading something generally agreed upon
as being all wet.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
--
"Trust me. I have a lot of experience at this."
General Custer's unremembered message to his men,
just before leading them into the Little Big Horn Valley
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l