Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of February, 2008
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] pre-to-post tests as measures of learning/teaching #2
,
02/01/2008 14:28, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Another g theory; is this wet or only damp?
,
02/04/2008 11:51, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another g theory; is this wet or only damp?
,
02/04/2008 12:58, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Another g theory; is this wet or only damp?
,
02/04/2008 13:32, Alfredo Louro
[Phys-l] Am I missing something here?
,
02/04/2008 15:58, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Am I missing something here?
,
02/04/2008 16:04, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Am I missing something here?
,
02/04/2008 16:30, Pete Lohstreter
Re: [Phys-l] Another g theory; is this wet or only damp?
,
02/04/2008 23:07, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] A quick survey
,
02/05/2008 12:58, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Kern arc
,
02/05/2008 14:01, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another g theory; is this wet or only damp?
,
02/05/2008 15:20, Alfredo Louro
[Phys-l] Anyone knows of a good test bank?
,
02/06/2008 15:11, smcccd
Re: [Phys-l] Anyone knows of a good test bank?
,
02/06/2008 15:46, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
[Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/06/2008 16:44, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/06/2008 17:05, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/06/2008 18:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/06/2008 23:15, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Anyone knows of a good test bank?
,
02/06/2008 23:31, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/07/2008 01:11, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-l] school data sources
,
02/07/2008 08:54, Pat Viele
[Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/07/2008 09:39, carmelo
[Phys-l] COURSE LOAD SURVEY
,
02/07/2008 09:51, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/07/2008 12:44, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Is Teaching an Art or a Science? (was valid assessment)
,
02/07/2008 13:06, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/07/2008 15:17, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/07/2008 16:46, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/07/2008 18:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/07/2008 21:15, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Am I missing something here?
,
02/07/2008 21:26, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Is Teaching an Art or a Science? (was valid assessment)
,
02/07/2008 23:42, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Is Teaching an Art or a Science? (was valid assessment)
,
02/07/2008 23:49, Martin Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Is Teaching an Art or a Science? (was valid assessment)
,
02/08/2008 00:12, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] Is Teaching an Art or a Science? (was valid assessment)
,
02/08/2008 00:17, John Clement
[Phys-l] Charge Neutrality and 'infinities'
,
02/08/2008 11:28, chuck britton
[Phys-l] The Crazy Old Sea Captain - A Parable of Science?
,
02/08/2008 13:25, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Charge Neutrality and 'infinities'
,
02/08/2008 20:03, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/08/2008 20:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] pre-to-post tests as measures of learning/teaching #2
,
02/08/2008 21:32, Harris, Bryan
Re: [Phys-l] pre-to-post tests as measures of learning/teaching #2
,
02/08/2008 22:06, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] pre-to-post tests as measures of learning/teaching #2
,
02/09/2008 10:03, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] [ncnaapt] The new STAR Physics RTQs are up
,
02/09/2008 11:58, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Effective teaching.
,
02/09/2008 12:37, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 13:12, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 14:33, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 17:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 18:43, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] The Crazy Old Sea Captain - A Parable of Science?
,
02/09/2008 21:51, Leon Deoliveira
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 22:09, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 22:32, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 22:55, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 23:06, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 23:34, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 23:44, Steve Clark
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 23:46, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 23:48, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/09/2008 23:59, Leon de Oliveira
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 00:07, John Denker
[Phys-l] Heat is a noun
,
02/10/2008 03:24, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 04:43, Leon de Oliveira
Re: [Phys-l] The Crazy Old Sea Captain - A Parable of Science?
,
02/10/2008 09:32, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 09:56, Cliff Parker
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is a noun
,
02/10/2008 11:11, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 11:24, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 11:59, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is a noun
,
02/10/2008 12:19, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 12:56, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-l] Heat is not a noun
,
02/10/2008 15:28, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 16:15, Connie Tyree
Re: [Phys-l] Effective Teaching
,
02/10/2008 16:48, Doug Vixie
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 17:06, James Mackey
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 17:06, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 17:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 17:36, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is not a noun
,
02/10/2008 17:50, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 17:53, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 18:11, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is not a noun
,
02/10/2008 18:24, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Effective Teaching
,
02/10/2008 18:46, Julie Quah
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is not a noun
,
02/10/2008 18:48, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 19:29, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 20:33, MJ and DS Weiss
[Phys-l] Increasing student enrollment in Physics
,
02/10/2008 21:40, Randy Kelch
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/10/2008 22:42, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Increasing student enrollment in Physics
,
02/10/2008 23:07, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] Increasing student enrollment in Physics
,
02/10/2008 23:45, Jennifer Myers
Re: [Phys-l] Increasing student enrollment in Physics
,
02/10/2008 23:57, Gordon, Debra
Re: [Phys-l] Increasing student enrollment in Physics
,
02/11/2008 01:45, Celeste Shibata
Re: [Phys-l] Effective Teaching
,
02/11/2008 05:07, Thompson, Michael U.
Re: [Phys-l] Effective Teaching
,
02/11/2008 05:49, Leon de Oliveira
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/11/2008 09:29, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/11/2008 12:58, Antti Savinainen
[Phys-l] COLD FUSION
,
02/11/2008 14:03, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/11/2008 15:39, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/11/2008 16:07, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/11/2008 16:14, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/11/2008 16:17, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/11/2008 16:42, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/11/2008 17:27, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] COLD FUSION
,
02/11/2008 17:33, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Another alternative theory horror
,
02/11/2008 21:58, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Stock Car Science
,
02/11/2008 22:04, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] defn of capacitance
,
02/12/2008 14:01, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is not a noun
,
02/13/2008 14:38, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Phys-L server outage
,
02/13/2008 14:41, Mark O. Kimball
[Phys-l] SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST
,
02/13/2008 14:53, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is a noun
,
02/13/2008 14:57, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is not a noun
,
02/13/2008 15:01, Philip Keller
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-L server outage
,
02/13/2008 15:09, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST
,
02/13/2008 16:38, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST
,
02/13/2008 16:41, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is a noun
,
02/13/2008 16:41, John Denker
[Phys-l] defn of Capacitance
,
02/13/2008 16:57, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is not a noun (correction)
,
02/13/2008 17:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST
,
02/13/2008 19:15, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST
,
02/13/2008 19:45, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-L server outage
,
02/14/2008 03:14, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] COURSE LOAD SURVEY
,
02/14/2008 16:17, Bill Nettles
[Phys-l] Origin & Significance of the Crazy Old Sea Captain Story
,
02/14/2008 18:15, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] for NIU
,
02/14/2008 20:57, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Origin & Significance of the Crazy Old Sea Captain Story
,
02/15/2008 08:03, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] Origin & Significance of the Crazy Old Sea Captain Story
,
02/15/2008 16:37, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Heat is a noun
,
02/16/2008 08:51, carmelo
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 08:55, Ben_Pearson
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 09:00, Ben_Pearson
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 09:03, Ben_Pearson
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 09:06, Ben_Pearson
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 09:10, Ben_Pearson
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 09:14, Ben_Pearson
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 09:19, Ben_Pearson
[Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 09:24, Ben_Pearson
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/16/2008 10:54, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 12:29, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 13:28, Ben_Pearson
Re: [Phys-l] Pearson, Ben is out of the office.
,
02/16/2008 14:48, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Trigg's Rules of Grammar - Challenged
,
02/17/2008 14:39, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 00:45, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 03:10, Leon de Oliveira
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 03:40, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 08:49, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 09:53, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 10:09, Paul Lulai
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 12:16, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 12:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/18/2008 13:40, Jeff Weitz
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/18/2008 14:30, Carl Mungan
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/18/2008 15:42, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/18/2008 16:15, John Denker
[Phys-l] A book for a school library
,
02/18/2008 17:26, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Fwd: A book for a school library
,
02/18/2008 17:37, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/19/2008 00:10, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/19/2008 10:18, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/19/2008 14:50, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/19/2008 15:51, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/19/2008 17:01, Jeff Weitz
[Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/19/2008 17:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/19/2008 18:53, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined.
,
02/19/2008 19:39, John P Lewis
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/19/2008 21:41, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/19/2008 22:22, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/19/2008 22:32, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/19/2008 22:36, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/19/2008 22:54, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/20/2008 00:32, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 01:11, John Denker
[Phys-l] Physics versus math; was energy is well defined
,
02/20/2008 08:14, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-l] Earthquakes in Baja
,
02/20/2008 10:01, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 10:26, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquakes in Baja
,
02/20/2008 10:37, chuck britton
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquakes in Baja
,
02/20/2008 11:13, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 11:16, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 11:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 11:57, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 12:08, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 12:10, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/20/2008 12:37, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 12:58, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquakes in Baja
,
02/20/2008 12:59, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 13:19, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] local conservation (was: non-grady ...)
,
02/20/2008 13:39, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 13:43, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/20/2008 15:15, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] local conservation (was: non-grady ...)
,
02/20/2008 15:52, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquakes in Baja
,
02/20/2008 17:00, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/20/2008 17:52, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] local conservation (was: non-grady ...)
,
02/20/2008 18:09, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] local conservation (was: non-grady ...)
,
02/20/2008 18:37, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] local conservation (was: non-grady ...)
,
02/20/2008 20:10, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/20/2008 20:42, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] errata from BN energy is well defined
,
02/20/2008 20:47, Bill Nettles
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/21/2008 00:10, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] information
,
02/21/2008 04:25, Sorin Cosofret
Re: [Phys-l] information
,
02/21/2008 08:30, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/21/2008 16:05, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/22/2008 00:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/22/2008 00:44, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Earthquakes in Baja
,
02/22/2008 11:42, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] local conservation (was: non-grady ...)
,
02/22/2008 12:44, Alfredo Louro
[Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 14:25, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 14:42, Larry Smith
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 15:23, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 15:30, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] non-conservative --> non-grady ???
,
02/22/2008 16:34, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 17:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 17:23, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 17:34, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 18:50, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 18:56, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 19:55, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 20:06, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 20:08, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/22/2008 22:08, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/22/2008 22:58, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/22/2008 23:41, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/23/2008 00:26, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/23/2008 10:09, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/23/2008 16:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/23/2008 22:59, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/23/2008 23:53, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] energy is well defined
,
02/24/2008 10:19, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Phys-l Digest, Vol 37, Issue 22
,
02/24/2008 14:24, Alfredo Louro
[Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/24/2008 16:16, Jacques Rutschmann
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/24/2008 16:33, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/24/2008 19:39, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/25/2008 14:05, Tom Sandin
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/25/2008 15:00, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/25/2008 15:23, Jacques Rutschmann
[Phys-l] (correction: relativistic mass . . .
,
02/25/2008 15:38, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/25/2008 18:11, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/25/2008 18:32, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/26/2008 08:13, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/26/2008 08:34, Herbert Schulz
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 09:31, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 10:30, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/26/2008 10:44, ludwik kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 10:47, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 11:13, Paolo Cavallo
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/26/2008 11:27, Michael Porter
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 11:45, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 11:59, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Grapher on macintosh
,
02/26/2008 12:21, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 12:57, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 13:08, Savinainen Antti
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 13:45, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] Non-existence of Transverse and Longitudinal Relativistic Mass
,
02/26/2008 15:17, Tom Sandin
[Phys-l] Paradoxes, or not. (Was: invariant mass...)
,
02/26/2008 15:51, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 16:05, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Paradoxes, or not. (Was: invariant mass...)
,
02/26/2008 16:13, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Paradoxes, or not. (Was: invariant mass...)
,
02/26/2008 16:27, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Paradoxes, or not. (Was: invariant mass...)
,
02/26/2008 16:55, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 19:07, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/26/2008 21:30, John Denker
[Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 09:45, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 10:23, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 11:39, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/27/2008 11:41, Tom Sandin
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 11:47, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/27/2008 12:39, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 12:51, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/27/2008 12:54, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] A good text on lobbying? All "you" want to know is in textbooks?
,
02/27/2008 13:45, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 13:53, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/27/2008 14:28, Tom Sandin
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 14:47, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 15:01, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] Free Versus Pedantic Thinking
,
02/27/2008 15:19, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 15:21, Rick Tarara
[Phys-l] INVERSE EPR AND RETRO CAUSATION
,
02/27/2008 15:42, Faraday321
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by
,
02/27/2008 16:13, Josh GATES
Re: [Phys-l] [math-learn] Re: Free Versus Pedantic Thinking
,
02/27/2008 16:35, Ralph A. Raimi
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/27/2008 16:50, Ken Caviness
Re: [Phys-l] [math-learn] Re: Free Versus Pedantic Thinking
,
02/27/2008 17:21, Joseph Bellina
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 17:51, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 18:27, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 18:37, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 18:43, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 19:51, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 20:02, John Barrer
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 22:52, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 23:21, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] momentum first and relativistic mass
,
02/27/2008 23:28, Dan Crowe
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/27/2008 23:55, Alfredo Louro
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/28/2008 00:24, Karim Diff
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/28/2008 01:24, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/28/2008 06:56, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/28/2008 08:01, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/28/2008 08:47, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/28/2008 09:21, carmelo
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/28/2008 10:42, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Should equation solving be done with calculators and robots or by hand?
,
02/28/2008 10:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Invariant mass and relativist mass...
,
02/28/2008 11:15, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Physics, chem, phys sci Modeling Workshops nationwide this summer
,
02/28/2008 14:04, Jane Jackson
[Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/28/2008 16:48, John Denker
[Phys-l] Snow tubing lab
,
02/28/2008 17:49, Dwight K. Souder
Re: [Phys-l] Snow tubing lab
,
02/28/2008 18:00, Ken Fox
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/28/2008 18:27, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/28/2008 23:54, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 00:08, LaMontagne, Bob
[Phys-l] Self Regulation
,
02/29/2008 00:45, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 09:47, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 09:57, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 10:06, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 10:09, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 10:11, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 10:16, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 10:26, mrmeyer
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 10:28, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 10:40, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 10:58, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 11:04, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 11:10, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 11:23, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 12:07, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 12:37, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 12:59, MJ and DS Weiss
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 13:05, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 13:10, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy (semantic quibble)
,
02/29/2008 13:13, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 13:21, Steve Highland
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 13:24, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy (semantic quibble)
,
02/29/2008 13:36, John M Clement
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy (semantic quibble)
,
02/29/2008 13:41, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 13:43, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 13:46, Rauber, Joel
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 13:56, Rick Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 15:46, Anthony Lapinski
Re: [Phys-l] special ed/relativity
,
02/29/2008 16:49, LaMontagne, Bob
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy
,
02/29/2008 19:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] innumeracy (semantic quibble)
,
02/29/2008 20:12, John Clement
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc