So -- awhile ago, I ran into another problem regarding uncertainties.
For some groundwater contamination, a friend had to compute a weighted
average of some values over times and locations. Some values were given
as standard (value ± uncertainty) or equivalent, which is of course
straightforward enough. But the question I wasn't sure about was how to
deal with the non-detect results... Often they were reported as
something like: "Less than xxx ppm" or somesuch...
Is there a standard accepted way to deal with non-detects? It seems not
quite correct to do any of the following: Ignore it, call it zero, use
the threshold detect value, or to use the threshold detect as the
uncertainty for either.
Anybody had a similar experience or know what accepted procedure is?
Jason Alferness
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A person, who is nice to you, but rude to the waiter/waitress, is not a
nice person. (This is very important. Pay attention - It never fails.)
Dave Barry from "FIFTEEN THINGS THAT IT TOOK ME OVER 50 YEARS TO LEARN"
Jason Alferness
University of Washington
Room B256B, Physics & Astronomy Building
Campus Box 351560
Seattle, Washington. 98195-1560