Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Looks like a big bypass cap to me, at the house "source" rather than at
each individual piece of electrical equipment. I suppose it might help a
little bit to even out voltage spikes and drops, but I very much doubt their
claimed savings.
/************************************
Down with categorical imperative!
flutzpah@yahoo.com
************************************/
________________________________
From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
To: Forum for Physics Educators <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>
Cc: Bill Norwood <bnorwood@umd.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 9:41:41 AM
Subject: [Phys-l] Comments requested. Was: Re: [tap-l] Energy Conservation?
Any comments from PHYS-Lers?
bc
On 2008, Dec 03, , at 08:24, Bill Norwood wrote:
Hi Taplers,
Hoax, right?
1. That device is not large enough to store a significant amount of
electrical energy in its capacitors.
2. There is no way to cycle back into the system "unused"
electricity, right?
http://www.freeeasygreen.com/
Thanks,
Bill Norwood
U of MD at College Park
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l