Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS

From: "Folkerts, Timothy J" <FolkertsT@bartonccc.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:06:32 -0600

As a UK resident it's worth pointing out that this comes from
the Daily Mail, possibly the dumbest newspaper available

On the other hand, the Times has a considerably better reputation. ;-)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/article721863.ece

Here is a link to a similar article from this more reliable source. And
a Google search showed that the story was covered in several British
newspapers.

Tim Folkerts

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
  - From: "Rick Tarara" <rtarara@saintmarys.edu>

References:
- [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
  - From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
  - From: "Alby Reid" <alby@bleary-id.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWN STUDENTS
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] STUDY SUGGESTS NO CHILD LAW MAY BE DUMBING DOWNSTUDENTS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread