Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Public education is just that PUBLIC. That is, it is ultimately controlled
by the citizenry through their elected officials--whether that be federal,
state, or local. While the states do and should promote free exchange of
ideas at the upper education level (although we've seen abuses of that)
through a tenure system and application of the principle of Academic
Freedom, it is less clear that such should be the case through the lower
(and required) levels of education. For the umpteenth time, the only reason
for tax-payer supported education is to produce productive members of the
society. Depending on the needs of that society (or at least the needs as
the majority see them), such education might be narrow and quite regimented.
The society might also opt for a broad and open curriculum--but ultimately
will still want to see that graduates of the program can read and write and
maybe even do a little arithmetic. In this system, the personal, religious,
and political views of individual teachers and/or individual administrators
(who BTW are ALSO public employees) are not relevant. Teach the approved
curriculum. Don't like it--lobby to change it or go teach in a private
school that allows your point of view.
As for being abused by the bean-counters, ultimately those are your
neighbors who are either willing to pay higher taxes (often property taxes)
to support education or they are not. MONEY controls all. Now does anyone
have any power without a union, without bargaining agreements? Some--but
you have to be prepared to exercise it. If 10,000 state teachers outright
quit at the same time, that would not violate any laws but would certainly
cause some minor problems within an unresponsive state system! But to do
that one must have some courage of conviction, have at least a couple months
of money saved up (and most don't), or be willing to take some jobs away
from the Mexicans for a couple months. Few are ready or willing to go that
far.
Now of course to 'test' as JC wants, you have to have a set of national
tests to replace the state tests so as to judge the effectiveness of
teaching in each state--and those 'ain't going to be the FCI! ;-) With all
the wailing and gnashing of teeth over state NCLB testing, what response
would a national test produce??
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rauber, Joel" <Joel.Rauber@SDSTATE.EDU>
To: "Forum for Physics Educators" <phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Phys-l] Kozol fasts to protest NCLB - defense of unions
John C. wrote:
|
| Is teacher tenure really a problem, or is needed protection
| against administrators that want their side of education
| promoted (creationism?
| McCarthyism? You name your favorite...)
|
| One way to look at this would be to compare test results on a
| state by state basis with the tenure laws. Since some states
| do not have tenure it might be possible to do a statistical
| analysis and see if there is a correlation.
| There should be 50 data points so this is a manageable
| problem. Anyone want to come up with some real answers????
|
| Of course to do it right one should correct for SES.
|
It would also be interesting to do such a study comparing states where
it is legal for teachers to strike and one's where it is illegal.
Joel R.
(Living in a state where it illegal for all state employees to strike,
not just public safety employees. And where we do not have binding
arbitration.) (kind of means all negotiating is meaningless)
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l