Re: [Phys-l] More cold fusion from UnderNews

[Ludwik Kowalski <kowalskil@mail.montclair.edu>]

Today was my greatest day, as far as cold fusion is concerned. I 
can finally say, yes, I saw the claimed effect in my own experiment. 
And it is much more convincing than what was presented at the 
recent APS meeting, and in unit #319 at

http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/

My last experiment ended yesterday, as described in

http://csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/327squeeze.html

Now I have spectacular results. I will describe them in that unit 
327, probably tomorrow. I hope some of you will be interested.

P.S. Please note that my CF website is no longer at the same server 
at which it used to be for four years.

Ludwik


----- Original Message -----
From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@redshift.com>
Date: Monday, May 7, 2007 2:41 pm
Subject: [Phys-l] More cold fusion from UnderNews

> NAVY EXPERIMENT GIVES BOOST TO COLD FUSION
>
> DAILY TECH - Navy scientists claim that slices of CR-39 plastic. . 
> . 
> have recorded the passage of atomic particles emitted during 
> successful 
> cold fusion nuclear reactions. New proof that cold fusion works 
> could 
> fuel additional interest in generating power from low energy 
> nuclear 
> reactions
>
> Cold fusion, the ability to generate nuclear power at room 
> temperatures, 
> has proven to be a highly elusive feat. In fact, it is considered 
> by 
> many experts to be a mere pipe dream - a potentially unlimited 
> source of 
> clean energy that remains tantalizing, but so far unattainable.
>
> However, a recently published academic paper from the Navy's 
Space 
> and 
> Naval Warfare Systems Center in San Diego throws cold water on 
> skeptics 
> of cold fusion. Appearing in the respected journal 
> Naturwissenschaften, 
> which counts Albert Einstein among its distinguished authors, 
the 
> article claims that Spawar scientists Stanislaw Szpak and Pamela 
> Mosier-Boss have achieved a low energy nuclear reaction that 
can be 
> replicated and verified by the scientific community.
>
> Cold fusion has gotten the cold shoulder from serious nuclear 
> physicists 
> since 1989, when Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann were 
unable to 
> substantiate their sensational claims that deuterium nuclei could 
> be 
> forced to fuse and release excess energy at room temperature. 
> Spawar 
> researchers apparently kept the faith, however, and continued to 
> refine 
> the procedure by experimenting with new fusionable materials. . 
.
> The Spawar method shows promise, particularly in terms of 
being 
> easily 
> reproduced and verified by other institutions. Such verification is 
> essential to widespread acceptance of the apparent 
breakthrough, an 
> important precursor to scientists receiving the necessary funding 
> to 
> fuel additional research in the field.
>
> http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=7168
>
> OUR COLD FUSION ARCHIVES
> <http://prorev.com/coldfusion.htm>http://prorev.com/
coldfusion.htm
> _______________________________________________
> Forum for Physics Educators
> Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
> https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l