Chronology	Current Month	Current Thread	Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)]	[Date Index] [Thread Index]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]	[Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?

From: <carmelo@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 10:55:13 +0800

John Denker wrote:

I don't know what Sciama said about this, but my usage agrees
with Misner/Thorne/Wheeler, with Weinberger, ..... and with
Einstein.

Reference: Gary Oas, ``On the abuse and use of relativistic mass''
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0504/0504110.pdf

By the way, American Journal of Physics has rejected Oas' manuscript "On the abuse and use of relativistic mass".
They should have *good reasons* for doing so.

Alphonsus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?
  - From: John Denker <jsd@av8n.com>
- Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?
  - From: "Rauber, Joel" <Joel.Rauber@SDSTATE.EDU>
- Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?
  - From: Jack Uretsky <jlu@hep.anl.gov>
- Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?
  - From: Jack Uretsky <jlu@hep.anl.gov>

Prev by Date: [Phys-l] Diasappearance of Bees
Next by Date: Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?
Previous by thread: Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?
Next by thread: Re: [Phys-l] E=mc^2 because E=mc^2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread