Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] Baryon Mass Values



So you're suggesting it has as much significance as the Titius-Bode sequence.

This "coincidence" suggests that such are independent and a constant mean rate. The requirements for the Poisson interval distribution.

bc, Poissonophile

p.s. unfortunately, I've probably already posted this w/o answer: Who is the famous scientist who commented on the Poisson interval distrib. w/ (paraphrase) This means an unfortunate incident is surely soon to be followed by another.

Jerry Franklin wrote:

On Feb 15, 2007, at 9:06 AM, Faraday321@aol.com wrote:

I have noticed a relationship involving the baryon mass values and the
difference between pion and muon mass values which is interesting. It MAY point to a deeper underlying symmetry but beyond this I can't say.
The relationship is

M_baryon= approx N* ( M-pion- M_muon)
Where N is an integer. Check it out.

Bob Zannelli

It is a remarkable coincidence that on the same day I saw this emaii, the arXiv
included the following abstract:
Paper: hep-ph/0702140
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 05:40:15 GMT (174kb)

Title: Pion and muon mass difference: a determining factor in elementary
particle mass distribution


cut