Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
"Indeed a big part of the rationale for having patent laws at all
is to encourage refinements and further improvements."
Just listened to a short on the history of cinema [Yes, a few hours
ago.], wherein the narrator explained that patent law stifled cinema
creativity. The wizard of Menlo Park wouldn't license his machines. As
soon as projection machines were invented cinema flowered especially in
France.
bc
p.s. In another episode the narrator explained the lack of copy write or
enforcement resulted in the greatest innovator (Méliès) to die penniless.
John Denker wrote:
on 10/18/2006 10:00 PM Ludwik Kowalski said the following:_______________________________________________
This thread made me think about a hypothetical situation with a car. An
inventor bought a car and then invented something to improve
performance. He adds this gadget to the existing structure and drives a
better car. Is he violating a patent law?
No ... unless his improvement is a re-invention of something covered
by another patent.
Indeed a big part of the rationale for having patent laws at all
is to encourage refinements and further improvements.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l