Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] "inelastic" (was: Interactive Physics Simulations)



My quick response on completely inelastic collisions being where the objects stick together after the collision was at the beginning physics level such as I do in both our calculus-based and algebra-based two-semester sequence of courses. In these courses the class has not been introduced to anything other than straight-forward mechanical forces (those from weight, friction, normal force, springs, and otherwise pulling or pushing). So there is no reason to include long-distance forces and their complications, although one should mention them as an aside to remind students that there is "more to come."

My presumption was that this was the level of the question that began this thread. In fact the usual general physics books, such as Serway and Jewett and others, do not introduce center of mass coordinate systems until after collisions are examined. To me this makes some sense since our intuitive feel is for the frame of reference in we as the observer are located. I do introduce center of mass coordinate systems extensively in upper level courses, such as modern physics, as needed.

Just a more extensive rationale for my earlier terse response.

Richard Bowman