Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
I am highly in favor of introducing calculus ideas without the formalism. In fact, I never mention the word "calculus," or related terms, when I am showing the students how to calculate the area under a non-linear curve, or how to use a spreadsheet to, in effect, solve a differential equation. But they get to see a lot of calculus without realizing it, and since it isn't called "calculus," they don't get freaked out by the fact that they are supposed to be in a "non-calculus" course. Later, when they study calculus, and see the ideas they saw before introduced in an explicitly calculus context, they are ready to accept the development without the panic that would ensue if they realized that I had been "sneaking" calculus in earlier.
I am also intrigued by your statement that the area-under-a-curve method
"[brings] in calculus ideas without the formalism." Doesn't the
average-force method also bring in the same calculus ideas?