Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?

["Jeffrey Schnick" <JSchnick@Anselm.Edu>]

John Decker wrote:
> Yes, energy is a "thing" by any reasonable definition of "thing".
> Maybe not a concrete tangible thing, but still a thing.
>  http://www.av8n.com/physics/reality-reductionism.htm

I read your well-written document on reality vs. reductionism with
interest.  Would you say that any real attribute/characteristic, such as
mass and length, of anything is a thing?  Also, would you say that speed
is a thing?

Jeff Schnick