Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of June, 2006
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 10:30, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 11:43, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 12:27, Carl Mungan
[Phys-l] Losing Heat
,
06/01/2006 13:11, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 13:23, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 13:47, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 14:04, Paolo Cavallo
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 16:06, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 16:39, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 16:47, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 17:12, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/01/2006 18:15, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Active Learning forums?
,
06/01/2006 18:36, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 18:48, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/01/2006 19:26, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Active Learning forums?
,
06/02/2006 00:28, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 10:30, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Active Learning forums?
,
06/02/2006 10:59, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 11:12, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera
,
06/02/2006 11:46, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Active Learning forums?
,
06/02/2006 12:39, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 12:55, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] Active Learning forums?
,
06/02/2006 13:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 14:00, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Unit Conversions (was Mass and Energy)
,
06/02/2006 14:09, Al Bachman
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 14:09, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/02/2006 14:45, Josip Slisko
Re: [Phys-l] Active Learning forums?
,
06/02/2006 14:49, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 14:49, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Unit Conversions (was Mass and Energy)
,
06/02/2006 14:57, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Exotic harmonies
,
06/02/2006 15:07, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 15:09, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Tutorial on the Time Symmetric Quantum Model (Quite Long ) prt 1
,
06/02/2006 15:09, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Unit Conversions (was Mass and Energy)
,
06/02/2006 15:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 15:18, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/02/2006 17:08, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 17:23, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 17:31, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 17:40, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] Losing Heat again
,
06/02/2006 17:40, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/02/2006 17:41, Richard Tarara
[Phys-l] The Administration Presents Its Policy on Gravity
,
06/02/2006 18:56, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/02/2006 19:28, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 19:39, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 20:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Losing Heat again
,
06/02/2006 20:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Smart Students
,
06/02/2006 21:30, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Oh the joys of fast computers.
,
06/02/2006 21:40, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 21:52, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/02/2006 22:09, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Losing Heat again
,
06/02/2006 22:18, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 01:03, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/03/2006 01:35, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 03:08, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Creation or Evolution?
,
06/03/2006 04:08, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 09:54, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math DegreesbutRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 10:40, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/03/2006 11:24, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/03/2006 11:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate MathDegreesbutRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 12:04, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 12:37, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of UndergraduateMathDegreesbutRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 12:47, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees butRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 14:19, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math DegreesbutRepresent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 14:29, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/03/2006 16:48, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/03/2006 18:53, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 19:25, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 19:34, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Decays
,
06/03/2006 19:47, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/03/2006 20:08, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 20:17, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Decays
,
06/03/2006 20:38, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 20:53, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/03/2006 21:00, Josip Slisko
Re: [Phys-l] Decays
,
06/03/2006 21:00, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/03/2006 21:25, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] Women Earn 46% of Undergraduate Math Degrees but Represent Only 8% of Math Professors ??
,
06/03/2006 23:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/04/2006 02:09, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/04/2006 11:30, Leigh Palmer
Re: [Phys-l] Decays
,
06/04/2006 11:42, Leigh Palmer
[Phys-l] Salary and Jobs
,
06/04/2006 15:01, paul giusti
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/04/2006 16:31, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/04/2006 18:01, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/04/2006 18:34, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/04/2006 18:58, jbellina
[Phys-l] Women Are Not Represented on Science/Math Faculties in Proportion to Their Earning of Undergraduate and PhD Degrees
,
06/04/2006 19:19, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] IoP & the Einstein Flip
,
06/04/2006 23:24, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Salary and Jobs
,
06/04/2006 23:52, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/05/2006 01:27, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Will ballistic pendulum trouble teacher? Was: Re: Salary and Jobs
,
06/05/2006 01:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Salary and Jobs
,
06/05/2006 02:04, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/05/2006 02:49, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/05/2006 10:11, Michael Edmiston
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/05/2006 11:20, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Lightning Rods
,
06/05/2006 11:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/05/2006 12:45, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/05/2006 14:14, Josip Slisko
[Phys-l] decay (fwd)
,
06/05/2006 22:40, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] Possible Palliatives for Paralyzing Pre/Post Paranoia
,
06/06/2006 19:36, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] OT? - Tapping Fiber-Optics.
,
06/07/2006 00:35, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] History of Friction
,
06/07/2006 22:03, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] History of Friction
,
06/07/2006 22:34, John Denker
[Phys-l] superposition applet - where did it go?
,
06/08/2006 13:18, Goettler, Robert
Re: [Phys-l] superposition applet - where did it go?
,
06/08/2006 13:47, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] superposition applet - where did it go?
,
06/08/2006 15:08, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] superposition applet - where did it go?
,
06/08/2006 17:32, Mason, Bruce A.
Re: [Phys-l] History of Friction
,
06/08/2006 22:28, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-l] History of Friction
,
06/08/2006 22:34, carmelo
[Phys-l] Do not toss your apple PowerBook P/S.
,
06/08/2006 22:51, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Academic integrity or better not blogging than sorry.
,
06/08/2006 23:33, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Quark Stars Postulated.
,
06/09/2006 08:37, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] visiting instructor or assistant professor
,
06/09/2006 14:38, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] active learning needs a theory
,
06/09/2006 19:20, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] Seeing the Light Activity
,
06/10/2006 21:34, cblehman
Re: [Phys-l] Seeing the Light Activity
,
06/11/2006 00:04, Keith Tipton
[Phys-l] Google's spread sheet
,
06/11/2006 00:41, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Google's spread sheet
,
06/11/2006 12:52, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Seeing the Light Activity
,
06/11/2006 13:17, Larry Woolf
Re: [Phys-l] Seeing the Light Activity
,
06/11/2006 14:15, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Google's spread sheet
,
06/11/2006 17:06, JMGreen
[Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/11/2006 17:23, JMGreen
[Phys-l] General Atomics and Larry's Materials
,
06/11/2006 22:01, CBLehman
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 08:31, Monce, Michael N.
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 09:09, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 11:37, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 13:22, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 15:41, Monce, Michael N.
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 15:51, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 16:12, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 16:36, JMGreen
[Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/12/2006 18:09, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] Google's spread sheet
,
06/12/2006 18:16, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/12/2006 18:23, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
06/12/2006 18:57, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/12/2006 20:42, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 22:11, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/12/2006 22:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/12/2006 22:25, Sheron Snyder
Re: [Phys-l] (no subject)
,
06/12/2006 22:33, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/12/2006 23:40, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 01:19, Scott Hill
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 02:08, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 02:18, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 09:49, Marc "Zeke" Kossover
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 11:16, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 12:10, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 12:34, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 13:05, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 13:18, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 13:20, Jeffrey Schnick
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 13:27, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 13:38, Monce, Michael N.
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 13:58, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 13:59, Hugh Haskell
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 14:07, Drago, Marcia
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 14:11, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 14:19, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 14:19, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 14:20, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 14:42, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Gray paper correction
,
06/13/2006 14:42, Monce, Michael N.
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 14:56, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 15:43, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 16:10, Robert Cohen
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 16:34, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Work and Energy: which first?
,
06/13/2006 17:16, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 18:03, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 20:27, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 20:44, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 21:14, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 21:30, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/13/2006 21:37, Richard Tarara
Re: [Phys-l] Innovation and change vs. the status quo
,
06/14/2006 00:20, Richard Hake
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/14/2006 01:44, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/14/2006 01:51, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/14/2006 13:13, David T. Marx
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/14/2006 13:24, Shapiro, Mark
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/14/2006 23:41, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 00:09, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/15/2006 11:55, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 13:43, Jim Diamond
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 14:14, Leigh Palmer
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 16:47, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 17:07, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 17:14, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 17:20, jbellina
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 17:20, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 17:36, Polvani, Donald G.
[Phys-l] Bypassing about 250 million years
,
06/15/2006 17:59, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 18:08, Bob LaMontagne
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/15/2006 18:31, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] removal
,
06/15/2006 19:21, paul giusti
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/16/2006 07:46, Polvani, Donald G.
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/16/2006 09:55, James E Mackey
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/16/2006 12:36, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/16/2006 13:17, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/16/2006 20:32, fred bucheit
Re: [Phys-l] climate change and climate scientists - editorial
,
06/16/2006 21:26, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/16/2006 21:34, Bernard Cleyet
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/16/2006 21:42, Jack Uretsky
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/17/2006 01:28, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Global Warming
,
06/17/2006 03:32, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-l] Have Undergraduate Education Reform Efforts Stalled?
,
06/17/2006 18:02, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] SET's Are Not Valid Gauges of Teaching Performance
,
06/20/2006 10:50, Richard Hake
[Phys-l] satellite dish controller
,
06/20/2006 13:28, Spagna Jr., George
Re: [Phys-l] satellite dish controller
,
06/20/2006 13:50, John Denker
Re: [Phys-l] satellite dish controller
,
06/20/2006 21:22, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] NRC: "Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2, 000 Years"
,
06/22/2006 20:33, John Denker
[Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/23/2006 06:06, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] NRC: "Surface Temperature Reconstructions for the Last 2, 000 Years"
,
06/23/2006 08:13, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/23/2006 11:13, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/23/2006 12:46, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/23/2006 13:07, Roger Haar
[Phys-l] FUNDAMENTALISTS NOT ONLY ONES WITH APOCALYPTIC VISIONS
,
06/26/2006 05:24, bernardcleyet
Re: [Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/26/2006 07:58, Mark Sylvester
Re: [Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/26/2006 14:37, John Clement
Re: [Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/26/2006 16:31, Folkerts, Timothy J
Re: [Phys-l] cell phone lightning hazard?
,
06/26/2006 17:32, John Clement
[Phys-l] Strange Attractors and Reflectors
,
06/28/2006 22:58, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] MIT Media Lab I/O Brush
,
06/28/2006 23:18, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Wikipedia on Epistemology
,
06/28/2006 23:37, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-l] Parachute
,
06/28/2006 23:43, JMGreen
Re: [Phys-l] Strange Attractors and Reflectors
,
06/29/2006 07:43, Ludwik Kowalski
Re: [Phys-l] Wikipedia on Epistemology
,
06/29/2006 07:58, R. McDermott
Re: [Phys-l] Parachute
,
06/29/2006 10:07, Matt Coia
Re: [Phys-l] Wikipedia on Epistemology
,
06/29/2006 10:21, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Strange Attractors and Reflectors
,
06/29/2006 12:43, Brian Whatcott
Re: [Phys-l] Strange Attractors and Reflectors
,
06/29/2006 13:53, John Mallinckrodt
Re: [Phys-l] Strange Attractors and Reflectors
,
06/29/2006 13:59, Chuck Britton
Re: [Phys-l] Parachute
,
06/29/2006 19:26, Herb Gottlieb
Re: [Phys-l] Parachute
,
06/30/2006 02:37, Matt Klics
[Phys-l] Bird Flight
,
06/30/2006 10:08, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Bird Flight
,
06/30/2006 10:18, Bob Sciamanda
Re: [Phys-l] Strange attractors and reflectors
,
06/30/2006 12:25, Jeff Weitz
Re: [Phys-l] Bird Flight
,
06/30/2006 13:03, Sheron Snyder
Re: [Phys-l] Parachute
,
06/30/2006 13:49, Matt Coia
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc