Chronology Current Month Current Thread Current Date
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] [Date Index] [Thread Index] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Prev] [Date Next]

Re: [Phys-l] nifty pendulum, conservation, et cetera



Didn't he try a "marble" ina bowel first?

bc, who objects to the "nearly-lossless" phrase, and calls N's 1st, Galileo's law.

p.s. A UCSC faculty member, ca. 1986, requested one of these. Re: JD's observation #2; I think T.S. Kuhn explains some of this.

John Denker wrote:

Here is a simple yet nifty demo: PIRA 1M40.15:

http://www.sfu.ca/physics/ugrad/courses/teaching_resources/demoindex/mechanics/mech1m/galileop.html

According to the discussion on that web page, this a demonstration of
"conservation of mechanical energy". Forsooth, it demonstrates
nearly-lossless conversion of gravitational potential energy to
kinetic energy and back again.

The curious thing is that Galileo published this in 1638. Apparently
not everybody got the point. Decades later Leibnitz was arguing that
kinetic energy by itself was conserved, and it took the better part
of two centuries for a full understanding of conservation of energy
to emerge.

General observations:

1) Galileo was reeeeeally smart.

2) History is strange and complicated.
_______________________________________________
Forum for Physics Educators
Phys-l@carnot.physics.buffalo.edu
https://carnot.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l