If the point you are making is that one can not look at any one year's
data and draw conclusions, then you are in agreement with the author of
the piece that is cited below. Therefore, according to the implications
of statements by the author; one shouldn't draw much, if any,
conclusions about the single year 1944.
________________________
Joel Rauber
Department of Physics - SDSU
Joel.Rauber@sdstate.edu
605-688-4293
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Forum for Physics Educators
| [mailto:PHYS-L@list1.ucc.nau.edu] On Behalf Of fred bucheit
| Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 6:47 PM
| To: PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU
| Subject: Re: UCS-fact sheet: 2005, the hottest N. hemisphere
| temp. on record
|
| According to the chart referenced by the URL below, 1944
| had a pretty high average temperature. Think it has anything
| to do with the enormous use of fossil fuels and the millions
| of tons of bombs dropped during the previous 3 war years?
|
| Fred Bucheit - The thinker starts with the data,
| the believer
| starts with the conclusion-
|
|
|
| >From: Bernard Cleyet <bernardcleyet@REDSHIFT.COM>
| >Reply-To: Forum for Physics Educators <PHYS-L@list1.ucc.nau.edu>
| >To: PHYS-L@LISTS.NAU.EDU
| >Subject: UCS-fact sheet: 2005, the hottest N. hemisphere
| temp. on record
| >Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 12:23:04 -0800
| >
| >http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/recordtemp2005.html
| >
| >
| >bc, who thinks there's Physics in this.
|
| _________________________________________________________________
| Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today
| - it's FREE!
| http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
|
_______________________________________________
Phys-L mailing list
Phys-L@electron.physics.buffalo.edu https://www.physics.buffalo.edu/mailman/listinfo/phys-l