Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
Moreover, I consider myself a religios person.0
I am a religious person because I (using Einstein's words)
"...stand in awe" before the wonders of Nature. I am a
religious person precisely because I am not adherent to
any religious system. I think there is difference between
being religious and being adherent to that or this
religion.
Therefore I think that messages like Dawkins' letter
are totally relevant for this forum,
since many of us
may be interested not only in the Ohm's law, but also
in big picture including phylosophical questions.
I do not see any reason why anyone claiming to be
religious should feel offended by such letter.
Why is it OK to question any scientific issue, including
the moral status of science itself, but it is not OK to
question anything about religion?