Chronology | Current Month | Current Thread | Current Date |
[Year List] [Month List (current year)] | [Date Index] [Thread Index] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] | [Date Prev] [Date Next] |
At 07:21 -0400 9/15/05, Jeff Weitz wrote:
My colleagues in the math department tell me that they teach math, not
physics, not chemistry, and not cooking. Their averaged out response to
physics is much the same as the averaged out response of members of the
English Department (excuse me, the Department of English). The math
teachers do a very good job of teaching such things as solving algebraic
equations and making graphs, but include almost no discussion of
applications until AP Calculus where they are required to talk a little
about kinematics and related rate problems. For this reason, students
get a shock when they take chem or physics because a problem described
verbally has to be solved using mathematics. The translation has to be
practiced for some time before they get it.
In their effort to teach "mathematics," apparently many math teachers
have forgotten that much of mathematics has real applications to the
real world (I'm afraid that some physics teachers have forgotten that
as well, but it's apparently not so widely done as in math).
This is, I think, a relatively recent phenomenon. I vividly recall my
college calculus course, now more than fifty years past, in which the
textbook (written by the department chair), which I still have and
frequently refer to, had many practical applications, both in