Phys-L List Archive
(by Date) of September, 2005
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Search Archives
Query:
[How to search]
[Phys-L] pl detele the pools challenge mail
,
09/01/2005 07:57, Julie Quah
[Phys-L] Re: Math SAT
,
09/01/2005 11:59, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: entropy
,
09/01/2005 19:56, Larry Smith
[Phys-L] Fwd: New Orleans Universities: ASU will accommodate students
,
09/02/2005 11:42, Jane Jackson
[Phys-L] Colleges and universities will accommodate students
,
09/02/2005 12:09, Richard L. Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: Colleges and universities will accommodate students
,
09/02/2005 12:20, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Colleges and universities will accommodate students
,
09/02/2005 12:30, Shapiro, Mark
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans Universities: ASU will accommodate students
,
09/02/2005 12:32, Wes Davis
[Phys-L] University post
,
09/02/2005 12:34, Wes Davis
[Phys-L] Re: Colleges and universities will accommodate students
,
09/02/2005 13:08, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: Colleges and universities will accommodate students
,
09/02/2005 15:13, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Physics Central Web site
,
09/02/2005 18:53, SSHS KPHOX
[Phys-L] Piaget
,
09/02/2005 20:11, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/02/2005 21:40, jbellina
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/03/2005 12:25, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/03/2005 15:47, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Physics Central Web site
,
09/03/2005 15:57, Larry Woolf
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/03/2005 16:36, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/03/2005 21:04, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/04/2005 11:58, jbellina
[Phys-L] Re: Physics Central Web site
,
09/04/2005 13:27, Warren Hein
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/04/2005 15:31, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/04/2005 17:50, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/04/2005 18:19, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: PHYS-L Digest - 4 Sep 2005 to 5 Sep 2005 (#2005-293)
,
09/05/2005 07:26, Eugene Mosca
[Phys-L] Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 terms?
,
09/05/2005 09:23, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 terms?
,
09/05/2005 09:45, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/05/2005 11:12, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 variables?
,
09/05/2005 11:15, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: PHYS-L Digest - 4 Sep 2005 to 5 Sep 2005 (#2005-293)
,
09/05/2005 11:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 terms?
,
09/05/2005 11:34, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 terms?
,
09/05/2005 16:23, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: What is Scientific Process?
,
09/05/2005 16:37, ALVIN BACHMAN
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget
,
09/05/2005 20:42, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: What is Scientific Process?
,
09/05/2005 20:52, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Has Piaget Gone Down For the Long Count? (was Piaget) - PART 1
,
09/05/2005 21:01, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Has Piaget Gone Down For the Long Count? (was Piaget) - PART 2
,
09/05/2005 21:04, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 terms?
,
09/05/2005 21:58, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: What is Scientific Process?
,
09/05/2005 22:06, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 terms?
,
09/05/2005 22:32, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Newton's Equation - 2 or 3 terms?
,
09/06/2005 01:47, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Gulf Coast universities: Arizona State Univ offers help
,
09/06/2005 02:31, Jane Jackson
[Phys-L] Fwd: study stars at Kitt Peak Observatory. TLRBSE
,
09/06/2005 11:44, Jane Jackson
[Phys-L] The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 10:03, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 11:50, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 13:44, Shapiro, Mark
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 14:06, Karl Trappe
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 15:13, Strickert, Rick
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 15:24, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 16:49, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 18:06, Strickert, Rick
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 18:24, Shapiro, Mark
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 18:37, Sheron Snyder
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 18:51, Karl Trappe
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 19:52, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] OT The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 20:54, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 21:01, fred bucheit
[Phys-L] Average earlier or average later?
,
09/08/2005 22:10, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 22:47, Strickert, Rick
[Phys-L] OT The Republican War On Science
,
09/08/2005 23:20, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/08/2005 23:33, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 00:05, John Denker
[Phys-L] A RESEARCH PROJECT (AND A GOOD LAB)
,
09/09/2005 00:19, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 01:47, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: The Republican War On Science
,
09/09/2005 02:43, Jim Green
[Phys-L] Politics on this Listserv
,
09/09/2005 02:47, Jeff Weitz
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 07:49, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 08:12, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 08:42, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Politics on this Listserv
,
09/09/2005 09:00, Herbert H Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 09:13, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Politics on this Listserv
,
09/09/2005 09:21, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 09:34, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 09:36, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 09:38, Quist, Oren
[Phys-L] Re: OT The Republican War On Science
,
09/09/2005 10:33, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 10:49, Zajac, Richard
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 10:52, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 11:03, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 11:05, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 11:07, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 11:22, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 11:35, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 11:49, Pamela L. Gay
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 11:54, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 12:27, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/09/2005 12:29, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 12:51, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 12:59, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 13:02, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 13:10, Richard L. Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 13:12, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 13:22, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 13:43, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 13:46, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: A RESEARCH PROJECT (AND A GOOD LAB)
,
09/09/2005 14:29, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 15:19, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 15:30, David T. Marx
[Phys-L] Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/09/2005 15:32, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 2
,
09/09/2005 15:34, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 15:56, Aaron Titus
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 16:02, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 16:12, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 16:58, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 17:15, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] For Mac users
,
09/09/2005 17:17, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 17:20, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: For Mac users
,
09/09/2005 18:11, SSHS KPHOX
[Phys-L] Re: Politics on this Listserv
,
09/09/2005 18:14, Sheron Snyder
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 18:37, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 19:22, cliff
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 19:25, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Hypergeometric Equation
,
09/09/2005 19:58, D.V.N.Sarma
[Phys-L] Re: Hypergeometric Equation
,
09/09/2005 21:20, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower"
,
09/09/2005 22:07, Jim Green
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 22:57, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: relativity: style +- technique
,
09/09/2005 23:08, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: A RESEARCH PROJECT (AND A GOOD LAB)
,
09/09/2005 23:15, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: For Mac users
,
09/09/2005 23:21, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower"
,
09/09/2005 23:25, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/09/2005 23:29, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower"
,
09/09/2005 23:44, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower"
,
09/09/2005 23:46, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 23:52, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/09/2005 23:54, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Question
,
09/10/2005 00:03, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Question
,
09/10/2005 00:05, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/10/2005 01:08, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/10/2005 08:01, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/10/2005 09:00, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: A RESEARCH PROJECT (AND A GOOD LAB)
,
09/10/2005 09:26, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/10/2005 09:32, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/10/2005 10:09, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower"
,
09/10/2005 14:01, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower"
,
09/10/2005 16:45, Jim Green
[Phys-L] Re: Hypergeometric Equation
,
09/10/2005 20:20, D.V.N.Sarma
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/10/2005 20:26, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Hypergeometric Equation
,
09/10/2005 20:47, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/10/2005 21:30, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/10/2005 21:35, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Excel substitute
,
09/10/2005 21:49, Jeff Weitz
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/10/2005 22:10, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/10/2005 22:31, Jack MacLeod
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/11/2005 00:21, Shapiro, Mark
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (not)
,
09/11/2005 01:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/11/2005 01:29, Bob Aikenhead
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/11/2005 01:32, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/11/2005 11:00, Sheron Snyder
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/11/2005 11:13, Sheron Snyder
[Phys-L] "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 12:03, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 12:05, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 13:29, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/11/2005 14:18, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/11/2005 14:31, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Latent heat of evaporation
,
09/11/2005 15:17, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/11/2005 15:46, ALVIN BACHMAN
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 17:23, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/11/2005 17:48, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 17:50, John Denker
[Phys-L] definition of 3-velocity
,
09/11/2005 17:52, John Denker
[Phys-L] definition of 3-velocity
,
09/11/2005 18:01, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Average earlier or average later?
,
09/11/2005 18:53, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 20:50, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 20:56, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 21:42, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/11/2005 23:59, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 00:02, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 00:14, John Denker
[Phys-L] invariances
,
09/12/2005 02:16, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/12/2005 02:48, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/12/2005 02:50, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/12/2005 09:35, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/12/2005 09:38, Pamela L. Gay
[Phys-L] Re: Excel substitute
,
09/12/2005 10:22, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 10:24, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Excel Substitute
,
09/12/2005 11:17, Jeff Weitz
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 12:34, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 12:34, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 12:34, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 12:36, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 12:36, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 13:34, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 13:49, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 15:23, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 15:32, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/12/2005 16:09, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] (German grammar, delete if uninterested)
,
09/12/2005 16:59, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count?
,
09/12/2005 18:34, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: (German grammar, delete if uninterested)
,
09/12/2005 18:43, Ken Caviness
[Phys-L] Fwd: The Rigid Rotating Disk in Relativity
,
09/12/2005 19:11, Robert B Zannelli
[Phys-L] The Rigid Rotating Disk in Relativity
,
09/12/2005 19:25, Robert B Zannelli
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/12/2005 19:29, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - PART 1
,
09/12/2005 19:44, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 20:34, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count?
,
09/12/2005 20:42, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 22:09, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 23:07, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/12/2005 23:54, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: (German grammar, delete if uninterested)
,
09/13/2005 00:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 09:20, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 09:35, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: The Rigid Rotating Disk in Relativity
,
09/13/2005 12:13, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 12:33, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] German phrase
,
09/13/2005 12:35, Mariam Dittman
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 12:39, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 13:20, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: German phrase
,
09/13/2005 13:41, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: German phrase
,
09/13/2005 14:15, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 15:20, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 15:58, Savinainen Antti
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 16:20, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: German phrase
,
09/13/2005 16:33, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: German phrase
,
09/13/2005 17:57, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: German phrase
,
09/13/2005 18:00, Mariam Dittmann
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 18:02, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 21:20, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/13/2005 23:18, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 02:15, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 05:23, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 08:17, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 08:45, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 09:19, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 10:45, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 12:43, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 12:45, Fayngold, Moses
[Phys-L] student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 12:58, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 13:20, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 14:10, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 14:18, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 14:22, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 14:24, SSHS KPHOX
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 15:03, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] thrown ball with air drag
,
09/14/2005 15:12, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 15:17, Bob Sciamanda
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 15:19, David T. Marx
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 16:29, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 16:36, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 17:04, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 17:13, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/14/2005 17:18, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/14/2005 18:02, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 18:12, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 20:27, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: 2+2=4
,
09/14/2005 20:57, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 21:14, Steve Clark
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 21:35, Peter Schoch
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 23:28, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/14/2005 23:59, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: 2+2=4
,
09/15/2005 01:03, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 01:09, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 02:38, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 03:24, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 04:10, Herb Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Math education
,
09/15/2005 04:28, Herb Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 04:43, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 05:00, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] student mathematical capabilities
,
09/15/2005 07:07, Jeff Weitz
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 07:50, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 08:49, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 09:04, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 09:23, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 09:33, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 09:35, Spagna Jr., George
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 09:58, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 10:28, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 10:59, Polvani, Donald G.
[Phys-L] PKAL information request
,
09/15/2005 11:03, Rick Swanson
[Phys-L] Re: PKAL information request
,
09/15/2005 11:17, Jerry Lisantti
[Phys-L] Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 11:48, Roger Haar
[Phys-L] Liberal-arts schools and limits on the major (was student mathematical capability)
,
09/15/2005 12:10, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 12:20, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 12:56, Monce, Michael N.
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 13:36, jbellina
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/15/2005 13:46, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal-arts schools and limits on the major (was student mathematical capability)
,
09/15/2005 14:01, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 14:05, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Back to "moving clocks" [was: Re: student mathematical capability]
,
09/15/2005 14:27, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 14:30, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 14:35, Larry Woolf
[Phys-L] Spam request. Was: Re: PKAL information request
,
09/15/2005 14:43, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/15/2005 14:46, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 15:11, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 15:21, Michael Burns-Kaurin
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 15:46, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 16:04, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 16:28, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 16:30, Roger Haar
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 16:46, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 16:59, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 17:07, Carl Mungan
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 17:24, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/15/2005 17:35, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/15/2005 18:08, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/15/2005 20:58, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/15/2005 22:33, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Liberal Arts colleges / student mathematical capability
,
09/15/2005 22:39, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/16/2005 05:50, David Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: Back to "moving clocks" [was: Re: student mathematical capability]
,
09/16/2005 08:06, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 08:58, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] PRST-PER journal links
,
09/16/2005 09:17, Robert Beichner
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 10:22, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 11:07, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 12:06, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Back to "moving clocks" [was: Re: student mathematical capability]
,
09/16/2005 12:34, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: Back to "moving clocks" [was: Re: student mathematical capability]
,
09/16/2005 12:48, jbellina
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/16/2005 13:01, Larry Woolf
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/16/2005 14:01, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Back to "moving clocks" [was: Re: student mathematical capability]
,
09/16/2005 14:12, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/16/2005 14:16, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/16/2005 14:20, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: "moving clock runs slower" (yes)
,
09/16/2005 14:24, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: 2+2=4
,
09/16/2005 14:30, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/16/2005 14:34, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 14:45, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Logic, was Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/16/2005 14:59, jbellina
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 15:48, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: 2+2=4
,
09/16/2005 15:53, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/16/2005 16:18, rlamont
[Phys-L] Re: Logic, was Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/16/2005 16:27, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/16/2005 16:36, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capability
,
09/16/2005 16:42, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: thrown ball with air drag
,
09/16/2005 16:49, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 17:27, Vern Lindberg
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 17:35, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 17:48, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 18:43, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 18:48, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 19:22, Herbert Schulz
[Phys-L] Text book prices
,
09/16/2005 19:53, D.V.N.Sarma
[Phys-L] Re: Text book prices
,
09/16/2005 20:49, David T. Marx
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 22:30, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] HS schedule
,
09/16/2005 22:48, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/16/2005 23:03, Vern Lindberg
[Phys-L] Re: Text book prices
,
09/16/2005 23:36, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: HS schedule
,
09/16/2005 23:41, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/17/2005 01:16, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: 2+2=4
,
09/17/2005 01:32, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: HS schedule
,
09/17/2005 01:51, Don McQuarrie
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/17/2005 02:56, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/17/2005 08:14, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/17/2005 12:47, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Science Under Seige (NS Sep 10 Issue)
,
09/17/2005 13:19, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/17/2005 14:53, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/17/2005 15:38, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/18/2005 04:14, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/18/2005 08:26, G.D. Williams
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/18/2005 14:09, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/18/2005 17:01, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/18/2005 21:33, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/19/2005 09:01, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/19/2005 09:47, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/19/2005 10:57, Larry Smith
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/19/2005 11:00, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/19/2005 11:58, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: Text book prices
,
09/19/2005 13:51, Zajac, Richard
[Phys-L] Re: Quarters vs Semesters
,
09/19/2005 14:01, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: Science Under Seige (NS Sep 10 Issue)
,
09/19/2005 14:05, Gordon Johnson
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/19/2005 14:46, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/19/2005 15:31, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/19/2005 16:00, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/19/2005 17:11, Quist, Oren
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/19/2005 17:18, R. McDermott
[Phys-L] Digital Multi Meters (DMM)
,
09/19/2005 17:20, ludwik kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/19/2005 18:27, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: Digital Multi Meters (DMM)
,
09/19/2005 18:33, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/19/2005 20:30, jbellina
[Phys-L] Fwd: How Spaghetti breaks extracts from PRL authors
,
09/20/2005 12:08, Dan MacIsaac
[Phys-L] Space Cycle
,
09/20/2005 16:44, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: Digital Multi Meters (DMM)
,
09/20/2005 18:40, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/20/2005 20:11, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/20/2005 20:49, John M Clement
[Phys-L] Re: Digital Multi Meters (DMM)
,
09/20/2005 23:45, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/21/2005 05:59, R. McDermott
[Phys-L] Re: Digital Multi Meters (DMM)
,
09/21/2005 10:53, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: student mathematical capabilities
,
09/21/2005 21:16, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Science Under Seige (NS Sep 10 Issue)
,
09/22/2005 01:28, Peter Craft
[Phys-L] infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 12:21, Dwight K. Souder
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 12:29, Pete Lohstreter
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 12:35, sampere
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 12:53, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 12:55, Strickert, Rick
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 13:42, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 14:21, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 14:23, John Denker
[Phys-L] OT: fun things
,
09/22/2005 14:26, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 14:28, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 14:52, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 15:11, Strickert, Rick
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 15:31, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] cosmic rays bombarding rocks
,
09/22/2005 15:40, Michael J. Moloney
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 15:55, SSHS KPHOX
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 16:19, Richard L. Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 16:40, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 17:05, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: cosmic rays bombarding rocks
,
09/22/2005 17:16, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 17:18, R. McDermott
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 17:19, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 17:21, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: OT: fun things
,
09/22/2005 17:30, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: PHYS-L Digest - 22 Sep 2005 - Special issue (#2005-324)
,
09/22/2005 17:39, Richard B Granoff
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 17:53, Roger Haar
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 18:04, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 19:33, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 20:07, Richard L Bowman
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 20:09, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 20:31, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 20:38, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: cosmic rays bombarding rocks
,
09/22/2005 21:11, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 21:36, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/22/2005 21:49, Pete Lohstreter
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 00:10, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 01:29, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 04:33, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 09:12, Jeff Weitz
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 09:20, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 09:49, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 10:02, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 10:09, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 10:11, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 10:31, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 10:34, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 10:42, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 10:50, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 11:09, John Mallinckrodt
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 11:25, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 12:11, Edmiston, Mike
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 12:39, John Denker
[Phys-L] water-rocket lifting a man?
,
09/23/2005 15:16, Dwight K. Souder
[Phys-L] Re: water-rocket lifting a man?
,
09/23/2005 16:56, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/23/2005 17:55, R. McDermott
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/24/2005 18:05, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/24/2005 18:51, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/24/2005 19:19, Robert Cohen
[Phys-L] Calculations on the AP Calculus Exam
,
09/24/2005 22:11, Jeff Weitz
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/24/2005 23:03, John Denker
[Phys-L] Hurricanes
,
09/25/2005 11:43, Ludwik Kowalski
[Phys-L] Re: Hurricanes
,
09/25/2005 14:16, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/25/2005 15:11, Michael Edmiston
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/25/2005 17:30, John Denker
[Phys-L] two types of "vector"
,
09/25/2005 17:45, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Hurricanes
,
09/26/2005 11:05, Roger Haar
[Phys-L] Re: water-rocket lifting a man?
,
09/26/2005 12:02, Gary Turner
[Phys-L] Re: water-rocket lifting a man?
,
09/26/2005 12:24, David Willey
[Phys-L] New Orleans
,
09/26/2005 20:56, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/26/2005 21:43, Hugh Haskell
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/26/2005 21:53, jbellina
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/26/2005 22:07, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/26/2005 23:20, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/26/2005 23:34, David T. Marx
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/26/2005 23:41, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/27/2005 09:10, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Millikan Lecture
,
09/27/2005 09:53, Warren Hein
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/27/2005 09:56, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: New Orleans
,
09/27/2005 13:00, Gordon Johnson
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/27/2005 14:51, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/27/2005 15:20, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/27/2005 15:52, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: infinite sig. figs.
,
09/27/2005 17:21, Rauber, Joel
[Phys-L] Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 17:30, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 18:20, jbellina
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 18:37, Dan Crowe
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 18:45, R. McDermott
[Phys-L] Re: Piaget? - Other Sources
,
09/27/2005 19:52, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 20:16, Herb Gottlieb
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 20:37, cliff
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 20:59, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 23:20, Folkerts, Timothy J
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/27/2005 23:26, von Philp
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/28/2005 00:30, Julie Quah
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/28/2005 01:34, John Clement
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/28/2005 07:13, Anthony Lapinski
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/28/2005 09:42, Michael Burns-Kaurin
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/28/2005 12:02, Jack Uretsky
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/28/2005 12:07, Daryl L Taylor
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/28/2005 13:10, David Willey
[Phys-L] Physics project rubric?
,
09/29/2005 12:53, Dwight K. Souder
[Phys-L] CAPTISE @ College of Wooster (in Ohio)
,
09/29/2005 13:00, Dwight K. Souder
[Phys-L] Re: taking stuff apart
,
09/29/2005 17:22, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/29/2005 17:31, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Science "Magic" Demos
,
09/29/2005 17:36, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] prompted by intelligent design
,
09/29/2005 17:53, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: taking stuff apart
,
09/29/2005 17:58, John Denker
[Phys-L] Piaget & Dewey: Down for the Count? - 47 Responses
,
09/29/2005 18:43, Richard Hake
[Phys-L] Re: prompted by intelligent design
,
09/29/2005 19:40, Shapiro, Mark
[Phys-L] Re: taking stuff apart
,
09/30/2005 07:32, Dwight K. Souder
[Phys-L] Re: Physics project rubric?
,
09/30/2005 07:34, Scott Goelzer
[Phys-L] Cell Phone Blues
,
09/30/2005 08:06, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Physics project rubric?
,
09/30/2005 08:14, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: Physics project rubric?
,
09/30/2005 10:08, SSHS KPHOX
[Phys-L] Re: taking stuff apart
,
09/30/2005 12:11, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Physics project rubric?
,
09/30/2005 12:17, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Cell Phone Blues
,
09/30/2005 12:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: Cell Phone Blues
,
09/30/2005 12:42, Rick Tarara
[Phys-L] A Barrel of Crude
,
09/30/2005 12:50, Brian Whatcott
[Phys-L] Re: what is "physics"
,
09/30/2005 13:13, John Denker
[Phys-L] Re: what is "physics"
,
09/30/2005 14:12, Thomas O'Neill
[Phys-L] Re: Cell Phone Blues
,
09/30/2005 17:05, James E Mackey
[Phys-L] Bad film Physics
,
09/30/2005 17:15, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: A Barrel of Crude
,
09/30/2005 21:21, Bernard Cleyet
[Phys-L] Re: what is "physics"
,
10/01/2005 10:52, John Clement
Chronology
Switch Index
[Year List]
[Month List (current year)]
Thread Index
Mail converted by
MHonArc